My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 3460-15
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 3460-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2015 4:21:40 PM
Creation date
10/28/2015 11:57:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
3460-15
Date
10/21/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A. For all Review Process II Applications. All Review Process II administrative decisions <br />shall be issued in writing and shall state the final SEPA determination on the proposed project. <br />The director or his designee shall review the application for consistency and compliance with the <br />applicable evaluation criteria and development standards. The director may attach to any permit <br />approval such conditions as may be necessary to assure compliance with this title, other <br />applicable city ordinances and regulations, or any regulations administered by local or other <br />agencies. Action taken on the application shall be one of the following: <br />1. Permit issuance or approval, which may include any conditions or requirements on <br />the project deemed necessary by the director; or <br />2. Permit denial explaining the reasons the permit was not approved. <br />Issuance of a permit by the city does not excuse the applicant of a requirement to obtain all <br />required permits and approvals from local or other agencies prior to proceeding with <br />construction. <br />An administrative appeal to the examiner is provided. Any appeals shall be in accordance with <br />the appeals section of this title (see Chapter 15.24, Article IV). <br />B. Supplemental Considerations for Land Divisions. For land division decisions under <br />Review Process II: <br />1. If the director and city engineer find that the proposed land division is consistent with <br />the land division evaluation criteria and development standards in Title 18 and other <br />applicable city ordinances and city standards, the application shall be approved. <br />2. If the director and city engineer find that the proposed land division is not consistent <br />with these standards, the director and city engineer may disapprove the application <br />stating reasons for disapproval, or return it to the applicant for modification or <br />correction with specific conditions or revisions that must be met for approval. <br />3. Decisions on all Review Process II land divisions shall include findings of fact and <br />conclusions. <br />4. Approval of a proposed land division shall constitute authorization for the applicant <br />to develop the land division as required in the approved application. Development <br />shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications as approved by the city <br />subject to compliance with all conditions and requirements of the preliminary <br />approval. A preliminary land division approval under Review Process II requires a <br />final land division approval under Review Process I or VI, as required by this chapter. <br />is hereby amended to read as follows: <br />Action taken. <br />A. For all Review Process II Applications. All Review Process II administrative decisions <br />shall be issued in writing and shall state the final SEPA determination on the proposed project. <br />The director or his designee shall review the application for consistency and compliance with the <br />applicable evaluation criteria and development standards. The director may attach to any permit <br />approval such conditions as may be necessary to assure compliance with this title, other <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.