Resolution 2246 - Laserfiche WebLink

s.-- 1 4. That the applicant has other available space on his property with suitable 2 zoning to allow the activity which he proposes for the area to be rezoned. 3 5. That there exists at this time sufficient B-2 zoned property within the 4 general area of this application to satisfy the needs of the community and no pressing 5 need exists to create additional B-2 zoning in this area at this time. 6 6. That additional commercial traffic would be generated on Fleming Street 7 by the proposed rezone which would create a hazard to the occupants of the residential 8 structures abutting Fleming Street. 9 7. That the applicant's proposed use of the property in the proposed rezone 10 area would involve certain nuisance factors such as pollution, noise and clutter which 11 cannot be mitigated by the proposed conditions of the contract rezone to a degree 12 sufficient to protect the inhabitants of the residential neighborhood from adverse 13 effects. 14 15 CONCLUSIONS 16 1. That the applicant in this matter has not sustained his burden to show that 17 the proposed rezone application would benefit the health, safety or general welfare of 18 the community. 19 2. The proposed zoning action is premature in the absence of demonstrated 20 need for additional business zoning in this area of the community and considering the 21 present status of the rezone area as a viable residential neighborhood. 22 3. The implementation of the guidelines set forth in the comprehensive plan 23 in this area should take place when the need for implementation outweighs adverse 24 effects on the existing neighborhood. 25 4. The recommendation of the City's Hearing Examiner should be rejected 26 and the request for rezone with conditions presently before the Council should be 27 denied. 28 29 / / / / / 30 / / / / / 31 / / / / / 32 -2-