3135 TULALIP AVE 2017-09-06 - Laserfiche WebLink

i 1 4. By allowing construction work to occur on the structure without required City inspections and approvals,the Respondent violated IRC 2 2009 R105.1 and IRC 2009 R113.1. 3 S. By failing to maintain the vacant structure and yards on the property, the Respondent violated IPMC 301.3. 4 5 6. The Examiner held that the conditions on the Property in violation of EMC 6 8.20.020 were public nuisances. 7 7. The other conditions that violated the IPMC and IRC are also nuisances pursuant to 8 EMC 16.005.040.A.12. 9 S. Yost did not appeal the Examiner's Decision. Q 10 9. To date,Yost has taken little if any steps to bring the house on the Property into 11 compliance with City codes. For example,since the Examiner's Decision,she has not applied for 12 any building permits necessary to begin lawful alterations or repairs to the house. 13 14 10. After the Examiner issued his Decision a fire significantly damaged the second 15 story of the house in April 2015. Over a year has passed,but Yost has not applied for building 1 16 permits to repair the fire damage. 17 11. Currently,parts of gutters are hanging loose,the back porch is rotting,a railing Y { 18 from the upper deck is hanging from a post,and the file damage remains. A tate covering the fire j i 19 damaged roof has blown loose making the interior of the house susceptible to weather. 20 12. Yost has not preserved the house from further deterioration. 21 13. The house has not been lawfully occupied since it was closed pursuant to the drug 22 23 nuisance abatement in 2011. 24 14. Yost did some work to remove some of the vegetation and accumulated junk and s s 25 other items in the yard,but it has since become littered and overgrown again. OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Yost Order CITY OF EVERETT Page 4 of 10 2930 Wetmore Avenue,10-C Everett WA 98201 (425)257.7000 a i