1502 PINE ST 2017-09-11 - Laserfiche WebLink

9. On August 3, 2010, the Respondent e-mailed Code Officer Fagerstrom, confirming that the tenant had moved out of the illegal unit. The unit remains vacant. (Testimony of Mr. Fagerstrom; Testimony of Mr. Claughton) 10. On November 15, 2010, Building issued Combination Permit#WC1010-002 to the Respondent. The permit would allow construction activity to bring the property into full compliance with the Everett Municipal Code. (Testimony, Mr. Lee) 11. At the public hearing a City representative indicated that the status of the subject property was unclear as to what code violations remain on site since the issuance of permit#WC1010-002. In light of this testimony, at the hearing the Hearing Examiner verbally ordered that the hearing remain open for the purpose of supplementing the record with a status report by a City's Building Official. 12. Mr. Kirk Brooks, a Building Department official, visited the site subsequent to the hearing. Pursuant to an oral order of the Hearing Examiner, on December 3, 2010, he submitted a status report of the condition of the property (hereinafter referred to as the "Brook's report") (Exhibit# 15, Kirk Brooks Report dated December 3, 2090) 13. In the Brook's report there were 6 items called out and the status of each item was described. Each item corresponded to the numbers of items that had been required in the City's Planning Department's response to a site plan that had been submitted by the Respondent on September 8, 2010. (Exhibits 12 and 12a) Each of these items is restated and the City's response. • 1. Move the south wall of the garage (the building adjacent to the alley) to a minimum of 5 feet from the south property line, and move the north part of the structure so it is no further north than the north wall of the adjacent accessory building. o Response: This work has not been completed • 2. Modify the deck structure extending into the north setback area so it does not extend beyond the north wall of the accessory building or so it does not exceed 30" above grade within the required setback area. o Response: This work has not been completed • 3. Remove the roof of the patio cover or any combination of other roof structures to the extent that lot coverage by all structures with a roof covering does not exceed 40 percent of the total lot area. o Response: A portion of this work has been completed. Additional computations will be required to verify that the "not to exceed 40 percent" rule is in compliance. 4. Modify the structure located on the south side of the principal dwelling so no portion of the structure is within 5 feet of the south property line or east of the wall of the principal dwelling. 4 ��