My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4408 RIVERFRONT BLVD 2018-02-21
>
Address Records
>
RIVERFRONT BLVD
>
4408
>
4408 RIVERFRONT BLVD 2018-02-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2018 8:26:37 AM
Creation date
9/11/2017 11:54:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RIVERFRONT BLVD
Street Number
4408
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DESIGNuz FIELD REPORT <br /> 2 of 5 <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 124 <br /> GeoDesign#: I Polygon-127-01 Date: 10/10/2016 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> P W 1505-005 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) I Weather: Cloudy, 50's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1700/1830 <br /> Distribution: I _ -- — <br /> --- <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg, E.I.T. <br /> m Site Plan(s) m Density Test Summary Signature: — �l <br /> Attachments: —� Installation Records ❑ Other <br /> Reviewed By: <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS (CONTINUED) <br /> Lot 119: <br /> Upon arrival, GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had completed excavation of the footing and <br /> crawl space area for Lot 119. GeoDesign noted that the exposed footing subgrade material for Lot 119 consisted of a gray <br /> silty SAND (f-m)with gravel (f-c) which could generally be probed less than 2 inches. In-place density tests taken on the <br /> exposed footing subgrade materials indicated that the materials had been compacted to greater than 95% of its maximum <br /> dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> It is GeoDesign's opinion that the exposed footing subgrade observed today is currently suitable for support of the intended <br /> structure. GeoDesign recommends that any loose and saturated material be removed from the base of the footing areas <br /> prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> A summary of our observations and density tests taken today can be found in the attached Figure 1, Figure 2, and Nuclear <br /> Density Gauge Data. <br /> The client and concrete subcontractor was notified of our observations prior to our departure from the site today. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to complywith the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm Is not responsible for site safety. This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations. The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 1 Seattle,WA 98133 1 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 1 253.203.0095 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.