Ordinance 1781-91 - Laserfiche WebLink

• • 2. Where the need to provide mitigations on a facility by the horizon year is needed regardless of the proposed development and: a. the current level of Service is "D" or better, the traffic impacts of the development will be considered mitigated by a contribution of a share of the costs for the improvements based on the development's percentage of, the total peak hour traffic trips at the horizon year on the facility less existing peak hour traffic volume; or b. the current Level of Service is "E" or "F" , the traffic impacts of the development will be considered mitigated by a contribution of a share of the costs for the improvements based on the development' s percentage of the total peak hour traffic trips at the horizon year on the facility. D. Any agreement to provide monetary contributions in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. Section 3: That Section 11 of Ordinance No. 1670-89 as amended by Section 7 of Ordinance No. 1733-90 which reads as follows: Section 11 : In the event that the traffic impact analysis is not required in accordance with Section 3 of this ordinance, the project proponent shall mitigate the project' s transportation impacts in accordance with the provisions of this section. The proponent shall be required to pay a a mitigation fee in an amount equal to Eighty Dollars ($80) for each trip which the development will produce with a twenty-four (24) hour period as determined in the 4th Edition of the Trip Generation Guidelines as prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers plus fees and mitigation assessed pursuant to a Local Transportation Plan adopted by Council . Any agreement to pay in accordance with the provisions of this section shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. Provided, if a project proponent disputes the Eighty Dollar ($80) fee described herein, the proponent has the option of having prepared at his/her own 7