My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 2978-07
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2978-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2015 2:37:30 PM
Creation date
12/16/2015 2:37:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2978-07
Date
3/14/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EVERETT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br /> B. Holding Capacity/Buildable Lands Analysis <br /> Buildable Lands Analysis. The Growth Management Act requires that counties complete a <br /> review and evaluation program every 5 years to determine if sufficient land is available to <br /> accommodate the adopted population and employment targets. The analysis must be based on <br /> actual densities of housing that has been constructed and the actual amount of land developed for <br /> commercial and industrial uses within the urban growth area since the adoption of a <br /> comprehensive plan. In 2002 Snohomish County Tomorrow completed a Buildable Lands <br /> Project with the intent of determining if sufficient land capacity existed to accommodate the <br /> 2012 population and employment growth targets of Snohomish County and cities within the <br /> county. (Everett's existing Comprehensive Plan was originally adopted in 1994 and included <br /> population and employment targets for 2012.) The analysis assumed that future projects would <br /> be at a similar density as developments constructed from 1995 - 2000, rather than the higher <br /> densities allowed by the zoning code. The report concluded that sufficient land was available to <br /> accommodate Snohomish County's and Everett's 2012 population and employment targets <br /> within Everett and Snohomish County overall. <br /> The buildable lands data was used as the starting point in developing the alternatives for the 10- <br /> year update to the Comprehensive Plan. The methodology: <br /> • Excluded parcels or portions of parcels that were considered undevelopable, including <br /> publicly-owned parcels (parks, schools utilities; etc) and critical areas and their buffers. <br /> • Assigned a development status to remaining parcels based on a set of criteria, including value <br /> of land and improvements. The four categories for development status are developed, <br /> vacant, partially used (assumes more development will occur on site), and redevelopable <br /> (assumes existing structures will be demolished and new construction will occur). <br /> • Residential density assumptions were assigned by zone to each development status category <br /> based on examining 5 years of development history(1995-2000). Assumed densities were <br /> lower than the densities allowed by the zoning code. Densities in zones that allow both <br /> residential and commercial use, assumed a mix of uses consistent with development that <br /> occurred in 1995-2000. <br /> • For commercial, industrial and mixed-use zones, assumptions for square footage per <br /> employee and floor area ratios were made for each employment sector(manufacturing, retail, <br /> etc.) <br /> • Dwelling unit and employment capacity were calculated for each parcel using the <br /> assumptions. <br /> • Population capacity was calculated by multiplying the number of dwelling units by average <br /> occupancy rate and persons per household. These numbers were reduced by factors that <br /> consider some of those properties will be used for public uses, such as parks and schools, and <br /> some property owners will not want to sell their properties. <br /> • Employment capacity was also reduced by public purpose and market reduction factors. <br /> • Projects approved after 2001 were added into the capacity. <br /> 1. Population and Employment Capacities for 2005 Comprehensive Plan Update <br /> Three alternatives were evaluated for the 10-Year Comprehensive Plan Update. Population <br /> assumptions for the first alternative, Existing Trends, were based on the Buildable Lands data, <br /> which assumes development similar to that which occurred between 1995 and 2000. The <br /> LAND USE ELEMENT 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.