Laserfiche WebLink
. • • <br /> 7. As part of the transaction, the Applicant intends to merge the vacant abutting lot <br /> with the lot on which the existing building is located. The property would be one <br /> parcel with the entire enlarged single lot being the property for the sale and the <br /> property for the development. (testimony of Mr. Haugen; testimony of Mr. <br /> Ingalsbe) <br /> 8. The existing parking for the lot on which the building is located is limited to four <br /> off-street parking spaces off the alley. For the proposed change of use, the City <br /> determined that the existing parking on the building's lot was insufficient and that <br /> the Applicant must provide additional parking. As a solution, the Applicant <br /> proposed to merge the abutting lot with the lot on which the structure is located in <br /> order to provide a parking lot with 16 off-street parking spaces. The total number <br /> of parking spaces available with the variance would be the 16 off-street spaces <br /> on the vacant lot and the existing four off-street spaces on the lot on which the <br /> subject property is located. (exhibit 2, site plan, page 1; testimony of Mr. <br /> Ingalsbe) <br /> 9. In order to convert the building to the proposed use, improvements must be <br /> made to the building. The Applicant has submitted a site plan that depicts the <br /> building footprint, the basement level floor plan, fire safety revisions and the main <br /> level floor plan. In addition, the Applicant submitted an upper level floor plan <br /> which depicts all the units used for residential purposes. (exhibit 2, site plan; <br /> testimony of Mr. Ingalsbe) <br /> 10. The City Planning Department representative testified that the parking provided <br /> at the building was nonconforming and does not meet the City standards. <br /> However, rather than expanding on the nonconformity, the City determined that <br /> the parking can be reviewed pursuant to the requested variance. According to <br /> City calculations, the variance would be a reduction from the required 52 off- <br /> street parking spaces and would allow 20 off-street parking spaces. The <br /> requested variance is a reduction of 32 required off-street spaces. (testimony of <br /> Mr. Ingalsbe) <br /> 11. The required off-street parking per City standards has not been available on-site <br /> for over 24 years. In the past, any parking needs were provided on the abutting <br /> lot. With the limited number of available parking spaces on the lot with the <br /> building, the City received no complaints over the years. The City's position is <br /> that with the authorization of the reduced parking availability there would be no <br /> detriment to the property or the general area. (exhibit 1, staff report, page 2; <br /> testimony of Mr. Ingalsbe) <br /> 12. The original building on-site was constructed in 1921, and in 1927 an addition to <br /> the structure was built. The original zoning was C-1, General Commercial, but it <br /> was rezoned in 2008 to BMU. All of the City's activities with zoning and issuance <br /> of building permits were done with the knowledge of the available parking on-site. <br /> (testimony of Mr. Ingalsbe) <br /> 3�� �O. <br />