|
1 ,
<br /> 1 , •, , - - • )
<br /> Ali �
<br /> 61,11-11311 . S
<br /> 4x -^+�
<br /> 12003 I`��*�__..yd---` _� t_ } ♦. `r c, %.%, SM 4
<br /> b 0 fi`-,�b--_; �1 S�1vMdRl .- .£ StvtL_ 119 ,
<br /> 7 D 10
<br /> ?7 106.o tc, 2 G 1918 r 105 4 18 3 ' ��,_4 - r, i sl")**
<br /> 1. . ,g, 1-(
<br /> aP ; %8 '
<br /> '4L----''''
<br /> ' .f -`5 _ ,-� M P SMff D3 Q 92.8 ii. , 1: --"4.-:----" --H-:--
<br /> �J
<br /> �_ a _j —c -105 J5
<br /> 1____. .*:::, 4
<br /> i � \ W
<br /> ::: :: : . : . : : : :::.:: . : : :.:,.: :.. .. ..:........ :: : . . : :.. : : .,.
<br /> .......... :.H.,...:.: „..........................:.:.:....„.:........._.......... ... . .... .... ,
<br /> . . . . . . . , . . . . . .„ ._ . . . .. .
<br /> „ „ . . . .... . . .„ „ . . , . . , .
<br /> . . . . , , , , . _ . .
<br /> . . . „ . „ . , . ..„.
<br /> ..
<br /> . , . . . , . „ , . , . . . . , .. . . -
<br /> . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . .
<br /> •eti
<br /> tt
<br /> ,.. . . . . . . .. ... . . . , . ., . , . . _ ...
<br /> ... . . . . .. . . . . . .
<br /> ._ . . . . . .. • . . .... . , .... . . ,
<br /> ,
<br /> . . . ., . .
<br /> .. . . . .r-f---
<br /> Hall . . L),'1\41.,,,
<br /> 7 7 lb, .
<br /> I Hi 2000 = ::°
<br /> 1
<br /> 1`:ix:f. .P� r .5sr t III
<br /> 1:1
<br /> r �,i r- e
<br /> 1 ,' ,.. .,, L ..,..„......:,...,...,.,:.:, ......,.....:. ,. .. .. ., . ... , ..„:,,.:.:., . ,. . :• • ,,
<br /> _ ..____ _.._ ... . ,.. . .,.... „i,
<br /> it, • i:
<br /> 51g ri: S,
<br /> 12
<br /> . PE gag
<br /> 11111
<br /> I ra• �.. 1995
<br /> rt:
<br /> \\\\*\\_
<br /> From: Eric Peterson [mailto:Eric.Peterson@ikpff.com]
<br /> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:41 PM
<br /> To: Jane Zimmerman
<br /> Cc: Kimberly McNabb
<br /> Subject: RE: WSU design review meeting
<br /> Hi Jane, I'm reviewing the discussion in the emails below about flow control for the new parking lots at WSU and I'm
<br /> wondering if it seems reasonable to you to characterize the existing building site (on the EvCC campus, not the "Big J"
<br /> site that I see is pasture) as impervious for the existing condition?
<br /> The building was very recently demolished (in late 2014). Screen shot below,the area in red is the building that was
<br /> demolished which is the same extent of the new gravel lot.The current situation is in the second screen shot, you can
<br /> see the grass didn't take well and much of the area is exposed.The sidewalk down the middle of the site is actually a
<br /> utility tunnel that was not demolished with the building.
<br /> i
<br /> I
<br />
|