Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> SECTION 5: PROPOSED PERMITTING SYSTEM <br /> 5.1 Introduction <br /> The purpose of the proposed permit process is to streamline the environmental review process at the <br /> site development stage by completing an up-front environmental review for the entire Southwest <br /> Everett/Paine Field Subarea. Potential mitigation measures for impacts are identified in the EIS on the <br /> Subarea Plan. Specific mitigation measures were adopted in the Subarea Plan and will be incorporated <br /> into future ordinance revisions when possible. When a property owner is ready to develop, they will <br /> know the range of allowed impacts and the mitigation measures that will be required for specific <br /> impacts. The developer will have 2 options: <br /> 1. The developer can propose a development that falls within the range of impacts identified in the <br /> EIS, incorporate all applicable adopted mitigation measures into the proposal, and comply with all <br /> City codes. This will result in an expedited review process, with no SEPA threshold determination <br /> required. Official public comment and administrative appeal periods will not be required; OR <br /> 2. The developer can propose a development that falls outside the range of impacts identified in the <br /> EIS. This will require a longer review process, with additional studies/analysis and public <br /> comment periods required under SEPA. <br /> Note that this proposed permit process will apply within the Everett city limits only. Snohomish <br /> County must decide how or if its permit process will be revised to expedite review of development <br /> proposals on Paine Field properties. <br /> The effort to expedite the permit review process was significantly enhanced by the Washington State <br /> Legislature's adoption of Engrossed Substitute House Bill (ESHB) 1724 in 1995. The legislature <br /> recognized that the Growth Management Act is the fundamental building block of regulatory reform <br /> and should serve as the integrating framework for all other land-use related laws. ESHB 1724 <br /> modified regulations related to the Growth Management Act, SEPA, the Shoreline Management Act, <br /> local permit processes, appeals procedures, etc. <br /> ESHB 1724 set up procedures to allow local governments to designate "Planned Actions." Planned <br /> actions means project actions that <br /> • Are designated planned actions by an ordinance or resolution. <br /> • Have had the significant impacts adequately addressed in an EIS prepared in conjunction with a <br /> comprehensive plan or subarea plan adopted under the Growth Management Act. <br /> • Are subsequent or implementing projects for the comprehensive plans or subarea plan. <br /> • Are located within an urban growth area. <br /> • Are not essential public facilities. <br /> • Are consistent with a comprehensive plan adopted under the Growth Management Act. <br /> Planned Actions do not require a threshold determination or the preparation of an additional <br /> environmental impact statement under SEPA. <br /> 23 <br />