Laserfiche WebLink
Port of Everett <br /> Terminal Rail Upgrades - Phase 1 <br /> City of Everett Design Review Comments <br /> Last Revised:7/23/2015 (A.Patterson) <br /> Bid Set Review Comments - 7/15/15 <br /> Plans <br /> Reviewer <br /> Sheet Detail Reviewer Comments M&N Response <br /> Initials <br /> All COE utilities will be encased per COE encasement <br /> 33 4 RH/SF Replace detail with COE Std Dwg 614(sheets 1&2) detail. <br /> The vault shown is existing. Model and name are not <br /> 33 5 RH/SF Label vault model/name available. <br /> I thought this pertained to all COE utilities, pressurized All COE utilities will be encased per COE encasement <br /> 33 Notes RH/SF or not detail. <br /> Relocation of the SSFM will require a temporary bypass <br /> plan. Revise plan per discussion at review meeting and The existing SSFM will not be relocated following <br /> SSFM General COE discuss at follow up review meeting discussion with COE and revising the design. <br /> Ductile iron sewer force main lining shall be epoxy The existing SSFM will not be relocated following <br /> SSFM General COE (Protecto 401) discussion with COE and revising the design. <br /> This connection detail is not necessary.A Fernco Proposed reroute of the SS gravity line no longer <br /> 32 2 COE coupler is sufficient requires this connection detail. Detail will be removed <br /> All COE utilities will be encased per COE encasement <br /> 33 1 COE Clarify use and locations of concrete encased utilities detail. <br /> Can relocation of the SSFM be avoided?COE will allow <br /> 11-degree bends in the gravity sewer(or 22-degree <br /> bend composed of two 11-degree bends with 5-foot <br /> separation)to potentially avoid the need for new The existing SSFM will not be relocated following <br /> General COE manholes on the relocated gravity sanitary sewer. discussion with COE and revising the design. <br />