501 E MARINE VIEW DR 2018-07-18 - Laserfiche WebLink

\ and waste generation process, and other additional information. If the Health Officer determines that testing is required to identify the waste,the generator shall be responsible for such analysis. If the Health Officer determines that the waste is not a dangerous waste under Chapter 176-303 WAC Dangerous Waste Regulations,but still poses a threat to human health or the environment,the Health Officer shall regulated the material as solid waste. As such,the Health Officer shall direct the generator,transporter,property owner or business operator to dispose or treat the material at specified site or in a manner specified by the Health Officer. Please refer to the letter from the Snohomish Health District dated June 15,2011 and see the updated comment in Information for Developer. 2. Written consent must be secured from Puget Sound Energy for any work within or affecting the natural gas line easement. Written consent can be secured through PSE's Real Estate Representative Faye Ryan at(360) 766-5455, or e-mail faye.ryan@pse.com. Also,see the updated comments in Information for Developer section. MITIGATION OF ADVERSE IMPACTS BY SEPA: The applicant must comply with all conditions listed on the Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance dated May 22,2006, In addition,the following SEPA condition shall apply: 1. The Applicant shall conduct monitoring of fill settlement as it relates to the 8"high pressure natural gas pipeline on the site. Puget Sound Energy,which owns the pipeline and maintains an easement within the site,has requested installation of settlement plates along the toe of the fill slope which would extend parallel to the easement. The Applicant should contact Jim Walker at PSE, at (425)462-3810,to coordinate settlement monitoring. (SEPA Earth,Environmental Health Policies) CITY'S RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED: The City received a total of 11 public comment letters in response to the public notice for this proposal, issued on September 30,2011. The following represents the City's review and response to the comments received. The comments have been categorized by topic. Please also refer to Applicant's response letter to public comments on the proposed Addendum dated October 18,2011 (see attached— "Exhibit 1"). 1. Issue: Purpose and Need for the Proposal. Response: Although the Applicant has not identified future land uses or activities for the site, Exhibit 1 states that raising the grade as proposed would bring the property closer to the existing grade of E.Marine View Drive. This would facilitate access to the property and create a"visual and noise buffer"between the rail yard and residential areas to the west. 2. Issue: Potential Impacts on Views. Response: This proposal does not directly impact views from properties on the west side of E. Marine View Drive or the park on the south side of the site because no specific development is proposed at this time. The finished elevation would be 50 feet,which is approximately 10 feet lower than the road surface on E. Marine View Drive. The dwellings on the west side of E.Marine View Drive are situated above the street grade,resulting in a grade difference of approximately 15- SEPA06-014/2nd Addendum/4/12/2016