My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7030 LOWER RIDGE RD 2018-07-25
>
Address Records
>
LOWER RIDGE RD
>
7030
>
7030 LOWER RIDGE RD 2018-07-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2018 8:16:34 AM
Creation date
7/25/2018 8:16:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
LOWER RIDGE RD
Street Number
7030
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kirk Brooks <br /> From: Kirk Brooks <br /> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2017 7:46 AM <br /> To: 'rdeccio@comcast.net' <br /> Cc: 'dana.hendry@hotmail.com'; Erik Emerson <br /> Subject: FW:7030 Lower Ridge <br /> Richard, <br /> I received the below comments regarding your report/design for this project from our drainage engineer. Please review <br /> and make revisions as needed.After consideration and changes,you can PDF the report back to me and I will print it out <br /> here to save some time. <br /> Best regards. <br /> Kirk Brooks <br /> City of Everett Public Works Department I Development Technician <br /> 3200 Cedar St, Everett, WA 98201 <br /> Office: 425-257-8810 <br /> Direct: 425-257-8814 <br /> Email: kbrooksdeverettwa.gov <br /> All emails, and attachments, sent to and from City of Everett are public <br /> records and may be subject to public disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56. <br /> From: Erik Emerson <br /> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 5:14 PM <br /> To: Kirk Brooks <br /> Subject: 7030 Lower Ridge <br /> Kirk, <br /> I have reviewed the drainage report and plans submitted for the proposed Duplex at 7030 Lower Ridge Road. I have the <br /> following comments: <br /> 1. The report section for Minimum Requirement#5 does a good job addressing individual BMP feasibility. <br /> However, some of the reasons provided for infeasibility are inadequate to fully justify infeasibility. Please <br /> provide additional infeasibility justification for the following BMPs: <br /> • Permeable Pavement: Use of infiltration rate as an infeasibility criteria requires a determination of <br /> infiltration rate using field investigation (PIT test). Under the new Ecology manual a classification of soils as <br /> Till is inadequate justification for an infeasibility determination. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.