Laserfiche WebLink
8. The Applicant submitted that there is an approximate ten-foot difference of <br /> elevation from the alley to the area where the garage would be constructed if <br /> access is off the alley. The Applicant argued that the difference in topography is <br /> an exceptional and extraordinary circumstance that warrants a variance. (exhibit <br /> 6, narrative; testimony of Mr. Brashler; testimony of Ms. Brashler) The City <br /> submitted that the grade difference between Wetmore Avenue and the alley is <br /> significant, and the alley is between 13 feet and 19 feet higher than Wetmore <br /> Avenue along the subject property. If the proposed garage were placed off the <br /> alley access, the garage floor would be approximately 15 feet above the <br /> Wetmore Avenue grade. If the proposed garage were placed using the Wetmore <br /> Avenue access, the garage floor would be approximately six feet above the <br /> Wetmore Avenue grade. The alley access would also place the structure's roof <br /> approximately nine feet higher than it would be placed with the Wetmore Avenue <br /> access. (exhibit 10, traffic comment and traffic collision report, page 1) <br /> 9. Other properties on the Wetmore Avenue block have direct access off Wetmore <br /> Avenue. Most of these properties on the west side of Wetmore Avenue have <br /> been developed with off-street parking. The multi-family structures that access <br /> off Wetmore Avenue were developed prior to the enactment of the Core <br /> Residential Development Standards. Properties on Colby Avenue, which is west <br /> of the alley, access off the alley. (testimony of Ms. Weldon; testimony of Mr. <br /> Brashler; exhibit 2, vicinity map) <br /> 10. The alley east of the subject property extends from 35th Street to the north to 36th <br /> • Street to the south. At the point where it fronts the subject property, it is 14 feet <br /> wide. (exhibit 3, topography map) As depicted on exhibit 7, page 3, the alley <br /> has curbs that are used in part to control storm drainage. The slope of the alley <br /> is to the south, and the slope of the subject property is to the southwest. For <br /> access to be provided to the subject property at the alley, the curb would be <br /> disturbed. The City of Everett Public Works Department submitted that a <br /> stormwater site plan would be required prior to the issuance of permits, and the <br /> plan would be required to demonstrate how stormwater runoff from the proposed <br /> garage and driveway would be managed. On-site stormwater management <br /> would be required, and any on-site stormwater management facilities would be <br /> required to be directed to a gutter line of Wetmore Avenue via the curb drain. <br /> (exhibit 11, Public Works comment) The disruption of the curb in the alley could <br /> have an impact on the storm drainage in the alley, as well as on the subject <br /> property. <br /> 11. The Applicant contended that they did not create the problem for the proposed <br /> location of the garage and its access. According to the Applicant, the problem is <br /> "a natural land slope that we cannot change, and the height difference makes our <br /> variance necessary". The Applicant submitted that the driveway had been used <br /> for many years. (exhibit 6, narrative; testimony of Mr. Brashler) <br /> • 4 <br />