Laserfiche WebLink
3. Admitted as exhibit 3 is an aerial photograph that depicts a number of residential <br /> structures on the 3500 block of Wetmore Avenue. The subject property, 3514 <br /> Wetmore Avenue, in exhibit 2, is highlighted in bold red borders. On both the <br /> north and south sides of the subject property are multi-family residential <br /> structures that have direct access off Wetmore Avenue. The alley for the <br /> property is on the left of 3514 Wetmore Avenue, while Wetmore Avenue is <br /> depicted to the right. There are a number of different types of driveways off <br /> Wetmore Avenue, and, there is parking in the alley. (exhibit 2, vicinity map; <br /> exhibit 3, topography map; exhibit 4, site plan) <br /> 4. The subject property, zoned R-3, Multiple Family Medium Density, is in a design <br /> overlay zone that is referred to as the Core Residential Area. This overlay zone <br /> was established in 2008, at which time parking and vehicular access standards <br /> were adopted. The new standards, including a standard that requires properties <br /> that abut an alley must have its vehicular access from the alley and not the <br /> street, were adopted by the Everett City Council to enhance safety, to keep <br /> parking from dominating the site, and to provide on-street parking. The intent of <br /> the standard is that no driveway access from public streets, such as Wetmore <br /> Avenue, be allowed. (exhibit 14, Core Residential Development Standards, <br /> page 1;exhibit 1, staff report, page 2; testimony of Ms. Weldon) <br /> 5. In the review of the requested variance, the City staff determined that vehicular <br /> access from the alley would be safer for pedestrians than access off the driveway <br /> that fronts Wetmore Avenue because the alley access would reduce potential <br /> conflicts for pedestrians. A report by the City of Everett Traffic Engineering <br /> Division included data on pedestrian/bicycle collisions in the last ten years in the <br /> 3500 block of Wetmore Avenue. In addition, a pedestrian/vehicular collision was <br /> noted near the location of the proposed driveway. (exhibit 1, staff report, page 3; <br /> exhibit 10, Traffic Collision Report, pages 2 through 5; testimony of Ms. Weldon) <br /> 6. The subject property has no City permitted off-street parking. With the use of the <br /> proposed driveway off Wetmore Avenue, one on-street parking space would be <br /> eliminated, but off-street parking for the residence would be increased by three or <br /> four parking spaces. If the garage were to access off the alley, two off-street <br /> parking spaces could be provided, and an existing parking space would remain <br /> on Wetmore Avenue. (exhibit 1, staff report, page 3) <br /> 7. The alley is at a higher elevation than the subject property. The slopes of the <br /> property were not specifically established at the hearing, but both the Applicant <br /> and the City agreed that to gain access from the alley would require engineering <br /> to accommodate the slope that would be encountered. An engineered retaining <br /> wall would also be required for the garage that would be constructed with access <br /> from the alley. The City submitted that an engineered wall would also be <br /> required if access is off Wetmore Avenue. The retaining wall would either <br /> support the slope or support a garage on the slope. (testimony of Ms. Weldon; <br /> testimony of Mr. Brick; testimony of Mr. Brashler; exhibit 1, staff report, page 3) <br /> i 3 <br /> / 6' <br />