My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WRK Engineers 10/18/2018
>
Contracts
>
6 Years Then Destroy
>
2019
>
WRK Engineers 10/18/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2018 10:26:28 AM
Creation date
10/25/2018 10:26:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
WRK Engineers
Approval Date
10/18/2018
End Date
1/31/2019
Department
Facilities
Department Project Manager
Chris Lark
Subject / Project Title
Trask Building Seismic Evaluation
Tracking Number
0001452
Total Compensation
$10,500.00
Contract Type
Agreement
Contract Subtype
Professional Services
Retention Period
6 Years Then Destroy
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E)CI-1113I T A <br /> SCOPE OF WORK <br /> Project Name: Trask Building Seismic Evaluation <br /> Location: 3025 Rucker Avenue, Everett, Washington <br /> PROJECT BACKGROUND <br /> The City of Everett is considering purchasing the Trask Building at 3025 Rucker Avenue. The existing <br /> building is a 3-story building that currently contains parking (on lower two levels) and commercial office <br /> spaces (on 3`d level). <br /> SCOPE OF BASIC SERVICES <br /> For the seismic evaluation, WRK Engineers (WRK) will use ASCE Standard 41-17, "Seismic Evaluation and <br /> Retrofit of Existing Buildings", published by the American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE).ASCE 41 is the <br /> nationally recognized Standard for seismic assessment and strengthening of existing buildings.The goal <br /> of ASCE 41 is to identify the "weak links" in a building's lateral-force-resisting system that can lead to <br /> significant failure and/or collapse. In addition,ASCE 41 will identify typical nonstructural hazards that may <br /> pose a life-safety risk to occupants or business interruption (i.e. operations) risks to the building. <br /> rs <br /> ( <br /> The methodology utilizes a series of checklists to screen for possible seismic deficiencies (i.e.Tier 1 <br /> Screening). Checklists are included in the Standard for all of the major structural systems, nonstructural <br /> elements,and geologic and site hazards.The evaluating engineer addresses each statement and <br /> determines whether it is compliant or non-compliant. Compliant statements identify conditions that are <br /> acceptable. Non-compliant statements identify conditions that need mitigation or further investigation. <br /> WRK understands that a Tier 1 Screening was completed recently for this building by City of Everett staff. <br /> WRK anticipates using the Tier 1 Screening as the basis for starting their evaluation. However, the WRK <br /> evaluation will use the Tier 2 deficiency-based procedures in ASCE 41-17 to address all known non- <br /> compliant Tier 1 statements and determine appropriate, cost-effective strengthening measures. As <br /> required by ASCE 41-17, nondestructive examination of connections and conditions will be performed <br /> during our site walk-through. In addition,default material properties will be used in lieu of performing in- <br /> situ destructive testing. <br /> The WRK evaluation will be based on Life-Safety Structural Performance and Life-Safety Nonstructural <br /> Performance considering the BSE-1N earthquake event with a 10% probability of occurrence in 50 years <br /> (475 year mean recurrence period). In other words,WRK will evaluate the building for compliance with a <br /> level consistent with the Washington Building Code for new Risk Category Il Buildings.The WRK evaluation <br /> will not incorporate a reduced hazard level (i.e. using 75% of BSE-1N) as WRK understands the City of <br /> Everett would like existing and new buildings evaluated for the same seismic force levels for direct <br /> comparison. <br /> Based on the WRI< ASCE 41-17 evaluation, they will provide estimates of the expected seismic <br /> performance using three critical measures; Safety, Damage (Cost), & Recovery Time. WRK will use the <br /> methodology developed by the United States Resiliency Council (USRC) Building Rating system in <br /> conjunction with the Earthquake Performance Rating System (EPRS) developed by the Structural <br /> Engineers Association of Northern California (SEAONC). The USRC Building Rating system identifies <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br /> i Y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.