My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
KLB Construction Inc 11/20/2018
>
Contracts
>
Capital Contract
>
KLB Construction Inc 11/20/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2019 10:44:01 AM
Creation date
11/29/2018 10:44:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
KLB Construction Inc
Approval Date
11/20/2018
Council Approval Date
10/24/2018
Department
Public Works
Department Project Manager
Heather Griffin
Subject / Project Title
Wes Marine View Drive Utilities
Public Works WO Number
UP3588
Tracking Number
0001487
Total Compensation
$1,379,227.25
Contract Type
Capital Contract
Retention Period
10 Years Then Transfer to State Archivist
Document Relationships
KLB CONSTRUCTION INC. 6/12/2019 Change Order 1
(Contract)
Path:
\Documents\City Clerk\Contracts\Capital Contract
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
783
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> 2 Performance Graded (PG) Asphalt Binder <br /> 3 <br /> 4 The first paragraph is revised to read: <br /> 5 <br /> 6 PG asphalt binder meeting the requirements of AASHTO M 332 Table 1 of the grades <br /> 7 specified in the Contract shall be used in the production of HMA. For HMA with greater <br /> 8 than 20 percent RAP by total weight of HMA, or any amount of RAS, the new asphalt <br /> 9 binder, recycling agent and recovered asphalt (RAP and/or RAS) when blended in the <br /> 10 proportions of the mix design shall meet the PG asphalt binder requirements of <br /> 11 AASHTO M 332 Table 1 for the grade of asphalt binder specified by the Contract. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 The second paragraph, including the table, is revised to read: <br /> 14 <br /> 15 In addition to AASHTO M 332 Table 1 specification requirements, PG asphalt binders <br /> 16 shall meet the following requirements: <br /> 17 <br /> Additional Requirements by <br /> Performance Grade(PG)Asphalt Binders <br /> Test PG58S- PG58H- PG58V- PG64H- PG64V- <br /> Property Method 22 22 22 PG64S-28 28 28 <br /> — <br /> RTFO I <br /> Residue: <br /> Average AASHTO <br /> Percent T 350' 30% Min. 20% Min. 25% Min. 30% Min. <br /> Recovery <br /> @ 3.2 <br /> kPa <br /> 'Specimen conditioned in accordance with AASHTO T 240-RTFO. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 The third paragraph is revised to read: <br /> 20 <br /> 21 The RTFO Jnrdiff and the PAV direct tension specifications of AASHTO M 332 are not <br /> 22 required. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 This section is supplemented with the following: <br /> 25 <br /> 26 If the asphalt binder verification sample test results fail to meet AASHTO Test Method T <br /> 27 350 "Standard Method of Test for Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test of <br /> 28 Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR)"for average percent recovery <br /> 29 @ 3.2 kPa for the applicable grades of binder in accordance with Section 9-02.1(4), the <br /> 30 Contracting Agency may elect to test the sample using AASHTO Test Method T 301 <br /> 31 "Standard Method of Test for Elastic Recovery Test of Asphalt Materials by Means of a <br /> 32 Ductilometer." <br /> 33 <br /> 34 When AASHTO T 301 is used, a minimum of 65% elastic recovery (ER) will be required <br /> 35 when tested at 25°C ± 0.5°C. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 9-02.1(6) Cationic Emulsified Asphalt <br /> 38 This section is revised to read: <br /> 39 <br /> WEST MARINE VIEW DRIVE UTILITIES PAGE 45 OF 60 August 2018 I <br /> WORK ORDER#3588 <br /> WSDOT AMENDMENTS Rev 4/2/18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.