220 OLYMPIC BLVD NEXTEL ANTENNA 2018-01-01 MF Import

(2) The adequacy of streets, utilities, and public services required to serve a proposed use. (3) The impact of traffic generated by the proposed use on the surrounding area, pedestrian circulation and public safety; and ability of the proponent to mitigate such potential impacts. (4) The provision of adequate off-street parking, on-site circulation, and site access. (5) Compatibility of proposed structures and improvements with surrounding properties, including the size, height, location, setback and arrangement of all proposed buildings and facilities, especiaily as they relate to light and shadow impacts on more sensitive land uses and less intensive zones. (6) The number, size, and location of signs, especially as they relate to more sensitive land uses. (7) The landscaping, buffering, and screening of buildings, parking, loading and storage areas, especially as they relate to more sensitive land uses. (8) The generation of nuisance irritants such as noise, smoke, dust, odor, glare, visual blight, or other undesirable impacts. (9) Consistency with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan for the area and land use designation which the property is located. (10) Compliance with the provisions of this ordinance and other City, State, and Federal regulations. • (11) Accessibility to pubiic transit and tra : reduction measures proposed by the Applicant to redu;.e dependence of the proposed use on the automobile. 6. The Applicant has identified "a hole" in its service for residential and commercial cellular service customers. The hole exists along the West Mukilteo Boulevard corridor; and as a remedy, the Applicant proposes to collocate the antennas on- site. The collocation is consistent with the City's desire to minimize the number of cell towers and helps provide adequate cell service to the general community. The proposal would be a public benefit. (exhibit 1, Fauver testimony) 7. Adequate provisions for access, utilities, and public services exist. There would be no change in the location of the tower. Streets, utifities, and public service exist and would not be further stressed with this proposal. (exhibif 1)