My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
900 PACIFIC AVE WOMEN AND CHILDREN PAVILLION 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
PACIFIC AVE
>
900
>
WOMEN AND CHILDREN PAVILLION
>
900 PACIFIC AVE WOMEN AND CHILDREN PAVILLION 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2023 1:25:00 PM
Creation date
12/7/2018 11:20:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
PACIFIC AVE
Street Number
900
Tenant Name
WOMEN AND CHILDREN PAVILLION
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
895
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Providence Family Services Center 9-91 M-12723-0 <br /> � Augusl 25, 1999 P�9 <br /> TABLE 4 <br /> ESTIMATED PROPERTIES OF ON-SITE SOILS FOR STABILITY ANALYSIS <br /> Soil Type Density Cohesion Inbrnal F�iction <br /> (pc� (ps� Angle <br /> (degreas) <br /> Medium-Dense Weathered Till 115 0 32 <br /> Ve Dense Glaciai Till 135 250 35 <br /> 5.2 Results of Analvsis <br /> IUtilizing the aforementioned values oi intemal friction angle, cohesion, density, and piezometric <br /> elevation, we calculated the safery factors associated with numerous slip surfaces, inGuding <br /> I circular and non-circular shapes. We subsequently found that the minimum safety factors <br /> correspond with a shallow slide that originates about 10 to 12 feet behind the slope brink. This <br /> sliding mode represents failure within the weathered till layer and indicates that the soil becorties <br /> ( more slide-resistant with depth; that is, deep-seated slope movements involving the giacial till <br /> deposit are highly unlikely. Appendix C of this report contains diagrams illustrating the various <br /> failure geometries. Our analyses yieided minimum safety factors of 1.21 and 1.26 under static <br /> I conditions, and safety factors of 0.97 and 0.98 under seismic conditions. Table 5 summarizes <br /> these anaiytical result�. <br /> � All of the static safety factors derived From our stability analysis meet or exceed the aforementioned <br /> acceptable minimum value, whereas two of the seismic safety factors are slightly below the <br /> acceptable minimum desired value. The latter results indicate that slope failure is possible during <br /> { a fairly strong earthquake (with an acceleration of 0.28 or higher). However, �uch a failure wouid <br /> � not necessarily be a totai collapse of the soil mass involved; rather, it might be only a subsidence <br /> of several inches or several feet. Furthermore, the results indicate that such a failure would <br /> Iprobably invo!ve only the soil within about 10 to 12 horizontal feet of the slope brink. <br /> � TABLE 5 <br /> CALCULATED SAFETY FACTORS FOR SELECTED SLIDE CONDITIONS <br /> ( Sliding Sliding Static Saismfc <br /> Depth Mode Safety Factor Safety Factor <br /> Shallow-seated Circular 1.21 0•97 i <br /> IShallow-seated Non-Circular 1.26 0.98 I <br /> Dee -seated Circular 1.53 1.22 � <br /> I (, <br /> I5�WOROPROC�99 PrqKu�SealUe�17000s�iP2]RoO�nspmPm�nOence HOIp�Rp1 wpa �� <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.