Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> i <br /> I Providence Family Services Center �'91�'�-12M� <br /> August 25. 1999 Pape 11 <br /> � <br /> I • Excavation Setbacks: Any planned excavations for fooGngs, grade beams, <br /> underground utilities,or partial basements should maintain an adequate horizontai <br /> I setback from existing foundation elements. We should be allowed to review ail <br /> proposed excavation pians and peRinent as-built foundaGon plans on a case-by- <br /> c2se basis in orderto develop appropriate setback distances,underpinning criteria, <br /> Ior shoring wall pressures, as needed. <br /> • St u i Considerations: If a composite(pile/pier and footing)foundation system <br /> I is utilized,the building wouid likely exhibit differential motions during an earthquake, <br /> due to differences in the stiffness properties of each foundation type. This corxliGon <br /> couid be mitigated or possibly even eliminated by employing a rtwre-unifortn <br /> I foundation system. Specifically, the entire structure could be supported either on <br /> piles/piers,in which case the pile/pier lengths would vary considerably,oron spread <br /> footings,in which case it would be advantageous to inGude a deep basement below <br /> ! a portion of the building. The project structural engineer should be allowed to <br /> � evaluate the design and performance impiications of each foundation system. <br /> I • Seismic Considerations: Based on our literature reviev+ and subsu�face <br /> interpretations,we recommend that the project structural engineer use the following <br /> I seismic parameters as appropriate fordesign of buildings,retaining walis,and other <br /> site structures. If a future version of the UBC is to be used for structural design <br /> purposes, we should be retained to assist the project structural engineer in <br /> Ideveloping appropriate seismic criteria. <br /> Design Parameter Value <br /> I Acceleration Coefficient (1996 USG5) . 028 <br /> Risk Zone (1997 U8C) 3 <br /> Soil Profile Type (1997 UBC) S-C <br /> • On-Site Soil Reuse: Our visual soil Gacsifications and laboratory testing indicate <br /> i that most of the on-site soils are moderately to highiy moisture-sensitive and <br /> � susceptible to disturbance when wet. In order to maximize the potential for reusing <br /> on-site soits as structural fill, earthwork should be scheduled for periods of dry <br /> I weather, such as usually occur during the summer and early fall months. <br /> • Sub rade Protection: Due to the moisture-sensitive nature of the on-site soils,the <br /> I contractor should install appropriate temporary drainage systems to keep water out <br /> of the construction areas,and should minimize traffic overany subgrades prepared <br /> within these soils. <br /> , • Environmental Consid�rations: Although we did not encounter any obvious <br /> indications of environmental contaminants within the on-site soils, these negative <br /> S�WOROPROC'�59 Pro�eclf�5ea111e�1200Ci':":J RoO��so��ProviOen[e NosµRpl.w�pE '�J <br /> -7 <br /> I <br />