Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> The Decision of the City of Everett Imposing Mitigation Pursuant to SEPA on the Expansion of <br /> the Boeing/Everett Airplane Manufacturing Facility("Decision Document")was issued on July 3, <br /> 1991, and revised by City Council Resolution No. 3528,September 18, 1991. Addendum No. 7 <br /> of the Decision Document, issued on February 1, 2001, required a cap of 21,000 on-site parking <br /> stalls and a cap of 35,000 on-site employees. <br /> Boeing and the City acknowledge the need for an updated system to the Decision Document to <br /> pay for actual traffic impacts as the Boeing facility changes and grows. Implementation of this <br /> new program will better track and mitigate for the actual increase in trip generation and <br /> require payments of mitigation traffic fees if the trip generation exceeds the amount for which <br /> Boeing has already paid mitigation. It is anticipated that this system will provide a more <br /> effective way for Boeing and the City to manage traffic impacts than the current system of <br /> limitations on the amount of on-site parking spaces and employees. <br /> Boeing has submitted the following documents related to this amendment: <br /> ® Environmental Checklist prepared on 3/23/2017 <br /> • Attachment A- Map showing Boeing Main Site and access point vehicle counting <br /> locations <br /> • Attachment B- Final Cost Estimate for the Direct Count Program <br /> ® Attachment C-A draft traffic study titled, "Proposed Methodology to Evaluate Boeing <br /> Driveway Counts for Determination of_ Mitigation Payments,"dated November 2013 by <br /> Gibson Traffic Consultants Inc. <br /> The City has reviewed the materials above and has accepted the general methodology. <br /> THE AGREEMENT: <br /> An agreement has been signed by the City of Everett and Boeing.The agreement titled, <br /> "Direct Count Program Agreement" is attached to this decision document. <br /> CONSISTENCY WITH MODIFICATION CRITERIA IN BOEING MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br /> Article VIII.E of the Decision Document addresses modifications to the Boeing Master <br /> Development Plan. In order for the City to determine whether a proposed change is minor or <br /> major,the plan contains three review criteria. This section states: <br /> A change shall be considered to be major when one or more of the following is <br /> found: <br /> 1. The change is in substantial conflict with a condition imposed in this Decision Document, <br /> such as major modification of an on-site TDM provision, or reduction of required wetland <br /> protection; <br /> 11?3 <br />