Laserfiche WebLink
CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT PARKING LOT Everett,Washington <br /> may be placed over soft subgrade areas to limit the thickness of structural fill required to bridge <br /> soft,yielding areas. <br /> Asphalt Pavement <br /> In light-duty pavement areas (for example, automobile parking), we recommend a pavement <br /> section consisting of at least a 2-inch-thick layer of 1/2-inch HMA (PG 58-22) conforming to <br /> Sections 5-04 and 9-03 of the WSDOT Standard Specifications, over a 4-inch-thick layer of densely <br /> compacted crushed rock base course conforming to Section 9-03.9(3) of the WSDOT Standard <br /> Specifications. In heavy-duty pavement areas (for example, truck traffic and materials delivery <br /> areas) around the building, we recommend a pavement section consisting of at least a 3-inch-thick <br /> layer of 1/2-inch HMA (PG 58-22) over a 4-inch-thick layer of densely compacted crushed rock base <br /> course. We recommend that proof-rolling of the compacted base course be observed by a <br /> representative from our firm prior to paving. Soft or yielding areas observed during proof-rolling <br /> may require over-excavation and replacement with compacted structural fill. <br /> The pavement sections recommended above are based on our experience with similar <br /> developments. Thicker asphalt sections may be needed based on the actual traffic data, intended <br /> use and performance expectations. <br /> Stormwater Infiltration <br /> Recommended Infiltration Values <br /> Two methods were used to evaluate an appropriate design (long-term) infiltration rate for the soils <br /> encountered in the test pit explorations. The two methods consist of correlations based on United <br /> States Department of Agriculture (USDA) soil textural classification and ASTM gradation testing, as <br /> discussed in Section 3.3.6 of the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington <br /> (Ecology, 2005). <br /> The following table presents a summary of the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions <br /> encountered in selected test pits completed in the area planned for parking, and the estimated <br /> infiltration rate based on the USDA textural class and on ASTM laboratory gradation testing. <br /> Sample USDA Approximate Estimate of Infiltration <br /> Test ASTM Dlo z <br /> hourInches <br /> Pit Depth Classification Textural mm Groundwater Rate( / ) <br /> (feet) Class ( ) Depth(ft)1 USDA ASTM <br /> TP-8 5 ML Clay <0.002 Not Encountered — 0.2 <br /> TP-9 4.5 ML Clay <0.002 Not Encountered — 0.2 <br /> Notes: <br /> 'Depth to perched groundwater below existing ground surface, measured at time of the excavation of the test pits. <br /> 'Infiltration rates shown for three different methodologies(Ecology,2005). <br /> The existing soils encountered in areas where infiltration is being considered consist of either loose <br /> silty sand with variable gravel content or stiff to hard silt and clay (glacially consolidated soil). <br /> The soils within the likely infiltration layer contain a variable percentage of fines, which can limit <br /> the infiltration capacity. <br /> GEOENGINEERS October 17,2012 Page 9 <br /> File No.10738-010-00 <br />