My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4302 RIVERFRONT BLVD 2019-03-14
>
Address Records
>
RIVERFRONT BLVD
>
4302
>
4302 RIVERFRONT BLVD 2019-03-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2019 2:05:45 PM
Creation date
3/14/2019 2:05:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RIVERFRONT BLVD
Street Number
4302
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 103 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-01 Date: 8/03/2016 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> .DFR052 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Clear,60's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1130/1530 <br /> Distribution. ....., ... ..,..,.....__ _.,_ __, _.. <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg, E.I.T. <br /> Attachments: Site Plan(s) m Density Test Summary Signature: <br /> Li Installation Records Other Reviewed By: <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS(CONTNUED): <br /> Lot 130(continued); <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation subgrade is currently suitable for support of the intended load. <br /> GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and/or saturated material be removed from the base of the footings prior <br /> to the placement of concrete. <br /> Lot 131; <br /> GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had completed the footing and crawl space excavation prior <br /> to his arrival on-site.GeoDesign noted that exposed foundation subgrade generally consisted of a brown silty SAND <br /> (f-m)with gravel (f-c)which could be penetrated generally less than 4 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe under the <br /> full weight of the user; in-place density tests taken on the four sides of the foundation indicated that the material had been <br /> compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> A summary of our observations and density tests taken today can be found in the attached Nuclear Density Gauge Data <br /> and Figure 1. <br /> GeoDesign notified the client and contractor of our observations prior to our departure from the site today. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnicai engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents.Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a GRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 210 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 1 253.203.0095 - /� , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.