My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2824 GRAND AVE NAUTICA CONDOMINIUMS 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
GRAND AVE
>
2824
>
NAUTICA CONDOMINIUMS
>
2824 GRAND AVE NAUTICA CONDOMINIUMS 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2021 11:52:33 AM
Creation date
3/19/2019 3:56:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
GRAND AVE
Street Number
2824
Tenant Name
NAUTICA CONDOMINIUMS
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY <br />Cascasia Pacific Properties, Ltd. <br />July 15, 1999 <br />E-8602 <br />Page 10 <br />As previously discussed, foundation support in the vicinity of the existing Burlington Northern <br />tunnel alignment, can be derived by the use of conventional continuous and spread footings, <br />or pile foundations. To limit foundation loading above the tunnel structure, conventional <br />foundations should maintain a minimum distance of 1.58 from the edge of the tunnel, where <br />"B" is the footing width. This minimum setback distance assumes at least two feet of soil <br />over the tunnel structure will be removed as part of the mass excavation. Use of the above <br />minimum footing setback, and removal of at least two feet of soil over the tunnel structure, <br />will effectively result in a compensating condition in terms of loading over the tunnel. ECI <br />should review the foundation plan and column loading to verify the footing setbacks, and to <br />modify the setback recommendations if necessary. As stated previously, Burlington Northern <br />should be contacted to discuss limitations on loading over the tunnel structure. <br />Recommendations for conventional foundations and piling design are presented in the <br />following sections of the report. <br />Conventional Foundations <br />For conventional foundations bearing on competent native soils or lean mix, an allowable soil <br />bearing capacity of five thousand (5,000) psf can be used. Foundations bearing on structural <br />fill should be designed using an ailowable soil bearing capacity of two thousand five hundred <br />(2,500) psf. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of <br />eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively. Loading of this magnitude would be <br />provided with a th^oretical factor -of -safety in excess of three against actual shear failure. A <br />one-third increase in the above allowable soil bearing capacities can be assumed for short-term <br />wind and seismic loading conditions. Exterior foundations elements should be placed a <br />minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches below final exterior grade. Interior spread foundations <br />can be placed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of slab, except in <br />unheated areas, where interior foundation elements should be founded at a minimum depth <br />of eighteen (18) inches. <br />Provided the foundations are installed in accordance with the recommendations contained in <br />this report, we expect total settlements of approximately one inch and differential settlement <br />of approximately one-half inch. Most of the anticipated settlements should occur during <br />construction as dead loads are applied. <br />Earth Consuhe,ttl, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.