My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2824 GRAND AVE NAUTICA CONDOMINIUMS 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
GRAND AVE
>
2824
>
NAUTICA CONDOMINIUMS
>
2824 GRAND AVE NAUTICA CONDOMINIUMS 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2021 11:52:33 AM
Creation date
3/19/2019 3:56:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
GRAND AVE
Street Number
2824
Tenant Name
NAUTICA CONDOMINIUMS
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY <br />Cascasia Pacific Properties, Ltd. <br />Jury 15, 1999 <br />E-8602 <br />Page 11 <br />Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the <br />supporting soil, and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the <br />foundation and grade beams. The foundation excavations must be backfilled with structural <br />fill to establish adequate passive resistance around the foundation elements. As an <br />alternative, foundations can be poured "neat" against competent native soils. Resistance to <br />lateral loads from passive earth pressures can be calculated using an equivalent fluid pressure <br />of three hundred fifty (350) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). For frictional capacity, a coefficient <br />of 0.40 may be used for foundations bearing on competent native soils, structural fill, or lean <br />mix. These lateral resistance values are allowable values, a factor -of -safety of 1.5 has been <br />included. <br />Footing excavations should be observed by a representative of ECI. Compaction testing of <br />structural fill in foundation areas should be periodically performed by ECI. <br />Pile Foundations <br />As an alternative to maintaining a minimum footing setback from the tunnel structure, the use <br />of pile foundations in the vicinity of the tunnel can be considered. Use of pile foundations will <br />serve to transfer the building loads below the bottom elevation of the tunnel, and result in no <br />increased loading on the tunnel structure. In our opinion, the piles should maintain a minimum <br />setback of ten feet from the edges of the tunnel. We recommend verifying this setback <br />distance with Burlington Northern. <br />Given the subsurface conditions encountered, and our understanding of the proposed building <br />loads, it is our opinion eighteen (18) inch diameter augercast piles can be considered. For <br />preliminary design purposes, an allowable axial capacity of ninety (90) tons can be assumed <br />for eighteer (18) inch diameter augercast piles advanced at least five feet below the bottom <br />of the tunnel structure. Based on the survey of the train tunnel, we estimate pile lengths of <br />approximately thirty-five (35) feet to forty (40) feet will be necessary to advance the piles a <br />minimum of five feet below the bottom elevation of the tunnel structure. <br />Eenh Coneuttaws. hw. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.