My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4422 31ST AVE SE 2019-04-18
>
Address Records
>
31ST AVE SE
>
4422
>
4422 31ST AVE SE 2019-04-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2019 1:20:05 PM
Creation date
4/18/2019 1:19:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
31ST AVE SE
Street Number
4422
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ar <br /> CEO DESIGN FIELD REP1 of ORT <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson <br /> Project <br /> GeoDesign#: j Polygon-127-O3 Date: 07/17/2017 <br /> 1 Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> I PW1505-005 <br /> I 1 Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) 1 Randy Allen(City of Everett) ' Weather Clear, 60-70'S <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) I Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 0930/1100 <br /> Distribution: .4- <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) 1 Kirk Keck(City of Everett) 1630/1700 <br /> Prepared By: Ben <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Weinberg <br /> m Site Plans) 0 De_nsltyTestSummary— Signature: <br /> Attachments: .— ` <br /> 0 Installation Records ❑ Other Reviewed By: <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg, was on-site part time at the request of Brandon/Leroy with <br /> BDZ to observe the foundation subgrade for Lots 256, 255, and 254. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> LOT 256: <br /> Previously, GeoDesign noted that the east side of Lot 256 required 2.0 to 2.5 feet of over-excavation to expose firm and <br /> unyielding material which could be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. Today, GeoDesign noted <br /> that BDZ had backfilled the over-excavated area with a cement-treated gray-brow silty SAND (f-m)with gravel (f-c)which <br /> was previously above its optimum moisture content. GeoDesign noted that the cement dust was added to stockpiles of <br /> material outside the foundation area and thoroughly mixed using the bucket of an excavator. GeoDesign noted that the <br /> material was mixed, placed, and spread in approximately 12 inch loose lifts using a Komatsu PC300 excavator and <br /> compacted into a firm and unyielding mass using a Hamm 3410 smooth-drum vibratory roller. Penetration depths <br /> encountered shortly after compaction were less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the foundation subgrade area observed today is currently suitable for support of the <br /> intended structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the base of <br /> the foundation area prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> LOT 255: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that BDZ had completed excavation of the footing and crawl space area for Lot 255 using a <br /> Komatsu PC300 excavator. GeoDesign noted that the west 3/4's of the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a gray <br /> to gray-brown silty SAND with gravel and concrete/asphalt. Penetration depths encountered across the west side of the lot <br /> area were generally less than 1 inch. GeoDesign noted that that the east 1/4 of the lot area required approximately 2.5 feet <br /> of over-excavation to expose firm and unyielding ground which could be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch <br /> diameter soil probe. GeoDesign noted that BDZ backfilled the over-excavated area with a cement-treated gray-brown silty <br /> SAND with gravel. GeoDesign noted that the material was mixed, placed, and spread in 12 to 18 inch loose lifts using a <br /> Komatsu PC300 excavator and compacted into a firm and unyielding mass using a Hamm 3410 smooth-drum vibratory <br /> roller. Penetration depths encountered shortly after compaction were less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil <br /> probe. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the foundation subgrade area observed today is currently suitable for support of the <br /> intended structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the base of <br /> the foundation area prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed BY section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.