Laserfiche WebLink
CEo <br /> FIELD REPORy- <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 057 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-03 Date: 07/17/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW 1505-005 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather:Clear,60-70's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) j Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 0930/1100 <br /> Distribution: { 1630/1700 <br /> -- <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) � Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> ___....._....__...........__.._.___......._._........_.._......._._. <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) [Dave Foster(City of Everett) Ben Weinberg Prepared B " <br /> m Site Plan(s) 0 Density Test Summary Signature: e°'7""` <br /> Attachments: o Installation Records ❑Other Reviewed By: <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS(CONTINUED): <br /> LOT 254: <br /> Today,GeoDesign noted that BDZ had completed excavation of the footing and crawl space area for Lot 256 using a <br /> Komatsu PC300 excavator. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a gray to gray-brown silty <br /> SAND with gravel and concrete/asphalt. Penetration depths encountered across the west side of the lot area were generally <br /> less than 1 inch.GeoDesign noted that that the east 1/4 of the lot area required approximately 3.0 feet of over-excavation to <br /> expose firm and unyielding ground which could be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. <br /> GeoDesign notified the client and contractor that the excavation was currently suitable for placement of structural backfill <br /> material. <br /> LOT 273: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed excavation of the footing and crawl space area for Lot 273. Previously, <br /> GeoDesign observed the removal of unsuitable fill material from 8-10 feet below bottom of plan footing within the building <br /> area and replacement with structural fill material. Today, GeoDesign noted that exposed foundation subgrade material <br /> consisted of a gray-brown silty SAND with gravel which could generally be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch <br /> diameter soil probe. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation subgrade observed today is currently suitable for support ofthe <br /> intended structure.GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and/or saturated material be removed from the base <br /> of the foundation area prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> A summary of our observations and density tests taken today can be found in the attached Figure 1. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents.Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By'section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 . <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.00953 <br />