Laserfiche WebLink
environmental mitigation requirements increased construction costs and higher standards 401 <br /> for design. <br /> Another factor that has affected the installation of new transportation infrastructure has <br /> been the tendency of residents in newer, partially developed, areas to oppose efforts to <br /> complete the circulation systems that are now incomplete. Combined with the shrinking , <br /> fmancial capability to provide improved transportation facilities, this resistance to new <br /> roadway capacity leaves Everett with fewer options to provide mobility choices to its <br /> residents. I <br /> At the same time that the ability and willingness to provide more roadway capacity is <br /> waning, the City and region continue to grow rapidly. In the next 20 years, another million 1 <br /> residents will live in the four-county central Puget Sound region; up to 25,000 more of <br /> them in the present City limits and over 40,000 more in Everett Planning Area. Travel on <br /> Everett's roadways, if it follows trends of the past, will increase at an even faster rate. <br /> Public attitudes opposing suburban sprawl have resulted in strong support for growth <br /> management laws that call for more compact forms of development. This new compact <br /> form is better served by a balanced mixture of travel modes, including more transit, <br /> ridesharing, walking and bicycling. This form is encouraged in the Growth Management <br /> Act and reflected in Everett's Preferred Plan. <br /> Everett has made an important choice about its future. That choice expresses a desire to <br /> see a more people-oriented City with better transit, easier pedestrian access and a shift <br /> away from street and land use designs that favor auto mobility alone. This broader, more 4111 <br /> balanced, vision of the future is translated into the transportation system investment <br /> strategy and policies in this Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The City has chosen to <br /> begin to change past trends in travel behavior, and the problems that it has presented, <br /> through new policies, programs and a supporting transportation investment strategy as <br /> outlined in this document. <br /> Key Transportation Issues I <br /> Concurrency. The concurrency requirement of the Growth Management Act calls for <br /> transportation improvements or programs put into place at the time that development is <br /> approved, or programmed to be in place within six years. The need for these <br /> improvements and programs is determined by whether the community's transportation <br /> level-of-service standard has been exceeded in the community. <br /> Everett's approach to this requirement is to agree to implement transportation <br /> improvements and programs that it can afford to finance. These improvements and , <br /> programs are based upon the Comprehensive Plan, which includes a level of service <br /> standard for the transportation system. Any residual impacts (such as increased <br /> congestion)that remain after affordable improvements and programs are put into place are <br /> accepted as an outcome of the Plan and reflected in the level of service standard. A <br /> Concurrency Management Program will be put into place following Plan adoption. Its <br /> T-2 � <br />