Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> 110 Geographic Extent of the Comprehensive Plan: <br /> 1. Everett Planning Area -- The Future City Limits? Everett is proposing a "planning area" <br /> I which includes not only all lands within the present city limits, but also extends to areas that are <br /> presently unincorporated and for which Snohomish County has the responsibility for planning and <br /> land use permit administration. These are areas that have a reasonable chance of being annexed to <br /> I the city within the twenty year horizon of the Growth Management Act. Citizen interest may <br /> prompt consideration of annexation beyond the proposed planning area boundaries shown on the <br /> attached map, while other areas located within the Everett Planning Area may ultimately be more <br /> logically served by one or more neighboring municipalities. The Everett Planning Area is drawn <br /> I with simple boundaries formed primarily by arterial streets, natural physical barriers, or special <br /> district boundaries. Everett is expected to focus its annexation efforts and provision of public <br /> services to the areas within the planning area boundaries. <br /> 1 Goals#1 and #2 of the Growth Management Act require that urban growth areas be designated in <br /> each county, within which future urban growth would be encouraged and outside of which only <br /> rural uses would be permitted. The Everett Planning Area boundaries ensure Everett's <br /> compliance with these two goals. With the exception of a small agricultural area and a few ravine <br /> and bluff areas in the area above Lowell-Larimer Road, all of the areas inside the Everett Planning <br /> Area are designated "urban" by the existing City or County comprehensive plans. The agricultural <br /> I area is to remain designated for agricultural zoning and uses. The ravine and bluff areas are <br /> included within the Everett Planning Area to create logical planning area boundaries and avoid the <br /> argument against future annexations on the basis of "irregular boundaries." They are protected <br /> I from urban development by existing and proposed environmentally sensitive area policies and <br /> development regulations. <br /> OP The Everett Planning Area has been divided into 6 Planning sub-areas, as indicated on the <br /> attached map. These smaller units make the collection of data simpler, which makes the different <br /> characteristics of the city and its urban growth area easier to understand. The general <br /> characteristics of each area are summarized in a later section entitled "Existing Conditions." A <br /> I description of potential changes to land uses and the transportation system for each subarea is <br /> contained in the Draft EIS on the alternative growth strategies of the plan. <br /> I 2. Outside the Everett Planning Area: Outside of the proposed Everett Planning Area boundaries <br /> are the comparable planning areas or urban growth areas for the cities of Mukilteo, Lynnwood <br /> and Mill Creek to the south, Marysville to the north, and an urban area to the southeast of Everett <br /> I not yet claimed by any existing municipality as being within its planning or growth area. This <br /> unclaimed area is served indirectly by the Everett water and sewer system, through the Silver <br /> Lake Water District. While Everett has expressed an interest in this area in the past, it is too far <br /> from current city boundaries to be considered a logical area for annexation and extension of <br /> 1 additional services within the twenty year horizon of the Growth Management Act. However, this <br /> area could be considered for future service by Everett if there is unprecedented interest in <br /> annexation expressed by area residents. <br /> IThe proposed growth or planning areas of other municipalities may overlap portions of the <br /> Everett Planning Area. Within these areas, further agreements are required to determine which <br /> cities should serve and ultimately annex these rapidly urbanizing unincorporated areas. Goal #11 <br /> I of the GMA requires close coordination between municipalities and counties for the planning of <br /> land uses, transportation, facilities and services. Cooperation with neighboring cities and the <br /> county is essential to provide adequate public services to these areas regardless of which cities <br /> ID may ultimately annex them. The Snohomish County Tomorrow planning process has provided a <br /> forum for close coordination between Everett and its neighboring jurisdictions. <br /> I <br /> 6 <br />