Laserfiche WebLink
DESIGN` <br /> C%.--1 �j���' �‘1't �C� FIELD REP. f. <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson I Report: 047 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-03 Date: 06/9/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Cloudy, 60's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1500/1630 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg <br /> Attachments: m Site Plan(s) m Density Test Summary Signature: (44,,4� <br /> ❑ Installation Records m Other Reviewed By: RL <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg, was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to <br /> observe the foundation subgrade for Lots 263 to 266. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> LOT 263: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that Craig with DDS had completed excavation of the foundation and crawl space area for Lot 263 <br /> to approximately 6 inches below plan bottom of footing. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade material <br /> consisted of a brown to gray brown silty SAND with gravel which could generally be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 <br /> inch diameter soil probe. Relative compaction of the exposed foundation subgrade material was tested using a Troxler <br /> Moisture-Density gauge; in-place density tests indicated that the material had been compacted to greater than 95%of its <br /> maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. GeoDesign notified Craig with DDS that the foundation <br /> subgrade area observed today is currently suitable for placement of backfill material. <br /> LOT 264: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that Craig with DDS had completed excavation of the foundation and crawl space area for Lot 264 <br /> to approximately 1 foot below plan bottom of footing. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade material <br /> consisted of a gray-brown to gray silty SAND with gravel which could generally be probed less than 3 inches using a 1/2 <br /> inch diameter soil probe. Relative compaction of the exposed foundation subgrade material was tested using a Troxler <br /> Moisture-Density gauge; in-place density tests indicated that the material had been compacted to greater than 95%of its <br /> maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. GeoDesign notified Craig with DDS that the foundation <br /> subgrade area observed today is currently suitable for placement of backfill material. <br /> LOT 265: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that Craig with DDS had completed excavation of the foundation and crawl space area for Lot 265 <br /> to approximately 1.5 to 2.0 feet below plan bottom of footing. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade <br /> material consisted of a gray silty SAND with gravel which could generally be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch <br /> diameter soil probe with probing depths of approximately 6 inches near the center of the lot(in area over-excavated 2 feet <br /> and appeared to be associated with high moisture content of material) Relative compaction of the exposed foundation <br /> subgrade material was tested using a Troxler Moisture-Density gauge; in-place density tests indicated that the material had <br /> been compacted to greater than 95% of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. GeoDesign <br /> notified Craig with DDS that the foundation subgrade area observed today is currently suitable for placement of backfill <br /> material. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations. The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by Initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />