Laserfiche WebLink
5. Compensate for the impact by replacing,enhancing,or providing substitute wetland areas and <br /> environm ntr <br /> actions. <br /> A. 8,--Wetland Preservation/Alteration Thresholds. <br /> 1. Category I Wetlands.All category I wetlands shall be preserved except as provided in this <br /> chapter.The planning director, using the review process as described in EMC Title 15, Local <br /> Project Review Procedures, may allow alteration of category I wetlands: <br /> a. Where alteration is allowed pursuant to Section 19.37.050 of this chapter; or <br /> b. The alteration is to allow a public park or public recreational use; provided,that there is no <br /> feasible and reasonable alternative to making the alteration and the alteration does not act <br /> to degrade the functions of the wetland, or the alteration proposed has a reasonable <br /> likelihood of being fully mitigated; <br /> 2. Category II, III,and IV Wetlands.All category II, Ill, and IV wetlands shall be preserved except as <br /> provided in this chapter.The planning director, using the review process described in EMC Title <br /> 15, Local Project Review Procedures, may allow alteration of category II wetlands: <br /> a. Where alteration is allowed pursuant to Section 19.37.050 of this chapter; or <br /> b. Where impacts cannot be avoided, and the applicant demonstrates through a mitigation <br /> sequencing analysis that reduction in the size, scope, configuration, or density of the project <br /> as proposed and all alternative designs of the project as proposed that would avoid or result <br /> in less adverse impact on a regulated wetland or its buffer are not feasible and will not <br /> accomplish the basic purpose of the project; <br /> 3. Category I, II, III, and IV Wetlands in the Silver Lake Watershed.When alteration of wetlands in <br /> the Silver Lake Watershed is allowed in subsections B.1 and B.2 of this section,the applicant must <br /> also demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning director and public works director that such <br /> activities will result in an enhancement of wetlands which improves the water quality functions <br /> of the wetland, or will improve the other functions of the wetland if the water quality functions <br /> of the wetland will not be degraded.Any such proposed activities shall be reviewed using the <br /> review process described in EMC Title 15Local Project Review Procedures; <br /> 4. The director may approve alteration of wetlands and buffers when proposedcompleted to <br /> restore or enhance wetland functions. <br /> B&. Compensating for Wetland Impacts. Wetland and buffer alteration allowed by this section shall be <br /> subject to the following requirements: <br /> 1. Each activity/use shall be designed so as to minimize overall wetland or buffer alteration to the <br /> greatest extent possible. <br /> 2. Construction techniques and field marking of areas to be disturbed shall be approved by the city <br /> prior to site disturbance to ensure minimal encroachment. <br /> 3. A mitigation plan shall be prepared in accordance with subsection D of this section. <br /> 4. The city may require the applicant to rehabilitate a wetland or its buffer by removing debris, <br /> sediment, nonnative vegetation, or other material detrimental to the area by replanting <br /> disturbed vegetation, or by other means deemed appropriate by the city. Rehabilitation or <br /> restoration may be required at any time that a condition detrimental to water quality or habitat <br /> exists. <br /> 5. Wetland Compensation Ratios. In approving alteration or relocation of a wetland,the city shall <br /> require that an area larger than the altered portion of the wetland be provided as compensation <br /> for destruction of the functions of the altered wetland and to ensure that such functions are <br /> replaced.The ratios in this section apply to creation, restoration, and enhancement which is in- <br /> EMC Title 19.37 (Critical Areas) Page 35 <br />