3301 SEAWAY BLVD WHOLE SITE 2025-10-30

" r Bothell,WA 98021 Office:425.774.0106 ext. 245 Cell: 206.794.3135 www.hwageo.com From:Sabrina Fandler[mailto:SFandler@everettwa.govl Sent: Friday, November 18,2016 12:01 PM To: Bryan Hawkins<bhawkins@hwageo.com> Subject: RE: 3301 Seaway Blvd- Peer Review Hi Bryan, No worries. I think we had some miscommunication on our end as well. Especially since we didn't explicitly call out the pond setback requirement to the developer and instead highlighted code sections that they must meet. I believe Paul wrote a separate email to Don Huling asking for the review to also include if the requirements of the PAD were addressed, but that information did not make it into the contract.We will make sure that our questions are better outlined for the next round of review. In the meantime, I would be interested to know your thoughts regarding the developer's Geotech responses to your comments.See if you agree with their responses or if you have significant concerns stemming from what they have said. I'll be sure to keep you in the loop with anything else that happens as far as what our requirements will be. Thanks, Sabrina Fandler, BIT, LEED®AP BD+C City of Everett Public Works Department( Development Technician 3200 Cedar St, Everett, WA 98201 Office: 425-257-8810 Direct: 425-257-7813 Email: SFandler((.everettwa.gov -74 MIMIC W The Permit Services Counter is located on the 2nd Floor. Hours of Operation: Monday-Friday 7:30am-12:oopm and 1:oopm-4:oopm. All emails, and attachments, sent to and from City of Everett are public records and maybe subject to public disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56. From: Bryan Hawkins [mailto:bhawkins@hwageo.com] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 11:27 AM To: Sabrina Fandler Subject: RE: 3301 Seaway Blvd - Peer Review Hi Sabrina, Regarding the pond setback, it was my understanding that the City had reviewed the design prior to our review, and wanted our input on the geotechnical aspects of the project. Hence,our review was focused on slope stability,wall design/location,earthwork considerations, pavement design, etc. I was unaware of your SWMM setback requirements, and did not know the history of your back and forth regarding the setback. But having the pond at the top of the slope was definitely a concern for us, as stated in our review comments. If no seepage/leakage could be ensured,the pond does not pose a significant geotechnical risk given the dense,glacially consolidated soils the slope is comprised of. This is why we asked whether an underdrain system could be installed or a way toguarantee zero seepage/leakage from the pond. I could have reviewed specific sections of your � 3