My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1901 W MUKILTEO BLVD Geotech Report 2022-10-25
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
1901
>
Geotech Report
>
1901 W MUKILTEO BLVD Geotech Report 2022-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 11:22:43 AM
Creation date
6/5/2019 8:33:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
1901
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Scriven Residence Improvements-REVISED NGA File No 974316 <br /> 1901 West Mukilteo Boulevard November 29,2016 <br /> Everett,Washington Page 10 <br /> significant surface water flow is encountered during construction, this flow should be diverted around <br /> areas to be developed,and the exposed subgrades should be maintained in a semi-dry condition. <br /> If wet conditions are encountered, alternative site stripping and grading techniques might be necessary. <br /> These methods could include using large excavators equipped with wide tracks and a smooth bucket to <br /> complete site grading and covering exposed subgrade with a layer of crushed rock for protection. If wet <br /> conditions are encountered or construction is attempted in wet weather, the subgrade should not be <br /> compacted as this could cause further subgrade disturbance. In wet conditions it may be necessary to <br /> cover the exposed subgrade with a layer of crushed rock as soon as it is exposed to protect the moisture <br /> sensitive soils from disturbance by machine or foot traffic during construction. The prepared subgrade <br /> should be protected from construction traffic and surface water should be diverted around prepared <br /> subgrade. Shallow groundwater, if encountered, should be intercepted with cut off drains and routed <br /> around the planned grading area, or the groundwater should be controlled with sump-pumps or <br /> dewatering systems. <br /> Addition Foundations <br /> We recommend that the proposed addition structure be supported on 2-inch pin piles to transfer <br /> foundation loads to the underlying native competent materials found below the fill. Our explorations did <br /> not encounter any significant debris within the existing fill, however there is a possibility that some <br /> obstruction within the fill may impede some of the piles. There should be contingencies in the budget and <br /> design for additional/relocated piles to replace piles that may be obstructed by debris. We also <br /> recommend that excavation equipment be available on site during pile installation so that shallow <br /> obstructions can be removed from the planned pile locations. <br /> For 2-inch diameter pipe piles driven to refusal using a hand-held, 140-pound jackhammer, we <br /> recommend a design axial compression capacity of two tons for each pile. The refusal criterion for this <br /> pile and hammer size is defined as less than one inch of movement during 60 seconds of continuous <br /> driving. We recommend using galvanized extra strong (Schedule 80) steel pipe. Maintaining these <br /> recommendations for minimum hammer size and refusal criteria is essential for obtaining a successful <br /> outcome. <br /> Final pile depths should be expected to vary somewhat and will depend on the depth of the loose material, <br /> the nature of the underlying competent soils, and groundwater conditions. The pin piles should penetrate <br /> a minimum of ten feet into the competent native glacial soils below the fill material in order to develop <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.