My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1901 W MUKILTEO BLVD Geotech Report 2022-10-25
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
1901
>
Geotech Report
>
1901 W MUKILTEO BLVD Geotech Report 2022-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 11:22:43 AM
Creation date
6/5/2019 8:33:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
1901
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Scriven Residence Improvements-REVISED NGA File No 974316 <br /> 1901 West Mukilteo Boulevard November 29,2016 <br /> Everett,Washington Page 11 <br /> the design capacity. Piles that do not meet this minimum embedment criterion should be rejected, and <br /> replacement piles should be driven after consulting with the structural engineer regarding the new pile <br /> locations. The piles should be spaced a minimum of three feet apart to avoid a grouping effect on the <br /> piles. <br /> Due to the relatively small slenderness ratio of pin piles, maintaining pin pile confinement and lateral <br /> support is essential in preventing pile buckling. Pin piles should be suitably embedded into the reinforced <br /> concrete. The structural engineer should design the connections of the piles to the foundations. <br /> Vertically driven pin piles do not provide meaningful lateral capacity. All lateral loads should be <br /> transferred back to the existing residence via grade beams. Due to the rigid pile support, friction between <br /> the foundation and subgrade soil should not be considered as resisting lateral pressures on this structure. <br /> Retaining Wall Design and Construction <br /> General <br /> Any proposed new retaining wall, for protection of the top of the slope, should consist of minimum 6-inch <br /> driven steel "H"piles (W6x25) bridged using pressure-treated timber lagging and anchored back into the <br /> slope using grouted tieback anchors or mechanical anchors such as helical anchors. The new retaining <br /> wall should be generally located along the existing top of the steep slope along the entire width of the <br /> property. The final extent and heights of the new retaining wall should be determined based on an <br /> accurate survey of the property. However, we recommend that the exposed portion of the new wall not <br /> exceed eight feet,but be no less than four to six feet. <br /> The retaining wall should be designed by an experienced structural engineer licensed in the State of <br /> Washington. The wall should be designed to resist an active pressure acting on the piles and lagging for <br /> design of the piles and should be calculated based on a triangular pressure distribution equivalent to that <br /> exerted by a fluid with a density of 60 pcf. This value is based on loads from the undocumented fill and <br /> loose soils that will remain behind the wall. A uniform surcharge of 8H should be applied to the wall <br /> design to account for seismic loading,where H is the total height of the wall. <br /> The above active load should be applied on the full center-to-center pile spacing above the base of the <br /> exposed portion of the wall. A 50 percent reduction of this value can be used for the purpose of designing <br /> the wall lagging. The active pressure should be entirely resisted by the tieback anchors. Passive <br /> resistance on the below grade portion of the piles should not be included in the design. <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.