Laserfiche WebLink
PLANS SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE REVIEW <br /> Project Title: <br /> Community Transit Swift II BRT— Corridor Stations (100% Design Level Comments) <br /> Job Charge: WSDOT Project Engineer: Office&Mail Stop: Phone: Date: Sheet <br /> Varies by Discipline August 22, 2017 1 of 3 <br /> Office: Comments by: Commenting Office&Mail Stop: Commentor's Phone: Date: <br /> Everett Public Works/Planning August 8, 2017 <br /> # Sht/Pg Reviewer's Comment By Designer's Response Init. <br /> Public Works Review <br /> 1 General I have reviewed the Community Transit SWIFT Erik Noted. Otak <br /> Drainage Station Construction plans. They appear to have Emerson <br /> addressed Jane's previous comments by <br /> clarifying what elements were to remain/removed <br /> and adding additional detail. However, the <br /> changes bring up the following comments: <br /> 2 General 1. General Comment-There are a number of Erik Noted. The construction notes and detail sheets have Otak <br /> Drainage references to EDDS standard plans.While this is Emerson been altered to reference City of Everett standard plans • <br /> acceptable considering the nature of the project where facilities are within City of Everett jurisdiction. <br /> the construction must still meet City of Everett <br /> standards where they differ from the County's <br /> requirements. <br /> 3 Plan Sheet 2. Sheet C4.30—GIS records indicate that there Erik Field visit confirms Otak's survey. See attached exhibit Otak <br /> C4.30 is a Sanitary Sewer main near the curb line which Emerson and photos. There is no evidence of sanitary sewer.lines <br /> is not shown in the plan. Please show the sewer or manholes as shown in 1998 Snohomish County <br /> main and ensure that the proposed catch basin Asbuilt. <br /> upsizing will not impact the sewer or manholes. If, however, the Snohomish County As-built proves to be <br /> See 1998 Snohomish County Asbuilt(attached). correct during construction, the sewer line as shown on <br /> the 1998 drawing is approximately 5-feet deeper than the <br /> proposed 6" PVC storm line it would cross (6" PVC storm <br /> line connects shelter downspout to CB641). <br /> 4 Plan Sheet 3. Sheet C4.30—Clarify the intent for the new Erik Correct. New CB642 is replacing the existing catch basin Otak <br /> C4.30 CB642. Presumably the replacement is to allow a Emerson to allow for the grate to be placed in the new gutter line. <br /> grate in the relocated gutter line without re- <br /> plumbing the storm drain line. <br /> Swift ii BRT Everett Public Works Comment Sheet_100 Stations_OtakResponse.doc <br />