11831 AIRPORT RD WHOLE SITE FILE 2020-01-21

s Kirk Brooks From: Corey Hert Sent: Friday, November 03, 2017 4:16 PM To: Kirk Brooks Cc: Tim Miller; 'Windi Shapley';Jim Knappert Subject: RE: Luminaire Rotation Plan Sheet Kirk, The wood pole luminaire is indeed City of Everett's. The light standard is essential to provide lighting for the transit stop and the crosswalks,and the aerial strike does go to the City signal pole. It appears the mast arm may have been turned about 15 degrees to maintain the required 10'to the PUD's current carrying conductors. Our standard luminaire is steel or aluminum pole 30'-35' high, however given the project is already in construction, and the pole is close to a coffee stand,we will give every consideration to no action. One option is the City could provide a pole,a junction box, and a luminaire and Elcon could install it. That may run afoul of agency supplied materials restrictions if the funding is Federal. Elcon could install a foundation and conduit and the City could come in and pull the wire/install the light standard. Windi, can you verify there is already security lighting integral to the transit stations that will be installed on the project?On Monday Steve Sawyer and I will meet in the field to decide the best course of action. Regarding the discussion of daytime lane closures,we would entertain lane closures on Airport Rd during the daylight hours. Here is what I think is realistic on the corridor: •Shoulder closures,sidewalk closures,and bike lane closures could be allowed without time restrictions provided there is no lane encroachment. Shoulder closures with lane encroachment shall will follow the same restrictions as single lane closures. •Single HOV lane closures could be allowed NB on Airport Rd between SR 526 and Evergreen Way from 7:30am and 4:30am, but restricted 4:30am to 7:30am during the morning commute.Single HOV lane closures could be allowed SB on Airport Rd between SR 526 and Center Rd from 5:00pm and 2:00pm, but restricted 2:00pm to 5:00pm during the evening commute. The exception would be Airport Rd south of Evergreen Way,which is Snohomish County jurisdiction, and 1000' north of Evergreen Way where there are only two through lanes approaching the signal. •Multilane lane closures are going to be needed to install the concrete pads over the weekends, and there should not be any significant congestion at these volume levels any time of day provided the traffic signals can stay in normal operation and intersection flagging is not needed. *Two lane closures (HOV+1)could be allowed NB on Airport Rd between SR 526 and Center Rd from 8:00am and 4:00am, but restricted 4:00am to 8:00am during the morning commute.Two lane closures(HOV+ 1) could be allowed SB on Airport Rd between SR 526 and Center Rd from 6:00pm and 1:30pm, but restricted 1:30pm to 6:00pm during the evening commute.We would want some assurance that two lane closures were done during daytime hours as a matter of necessity and to accelerate the work,and not strictly as a matter of convenience.We would want the bike lane and sidewalks reopened as soon as feasible, and if daytime work accelerates this, I am supportive of day work. I do think there is an opportunity to close lanes during daylight hours that they will not have on the Snohomish County or WSDOT portions of the work because traffic volumes are much higher there. If you have any questions, let me know. ILTIVIMIC WOW Corey N. Hert, PE Associate Traffic Engineer City of Everett Public Works