Laserfiche WebLink
Groundwater Conditions <br /> As discussed previously,a seasonally perched groundwater condition should be anticipated throughout the <br /> site. Water infiltrating through the fill and upper weathered till zone is often perched above the dense, <br /> unweathered till. Observed groundwater conditions are summarized for each segment in the previous <br /> sections but represent a short-term condition.Groundwater observed during drilling is often inaccurate due <br /> to the drilling techniques and the limited time the hole is left open. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Summary of Geotechnical Considerations <br /> We conclude that the planned improvements can be successfully completed from a geotechnical <br /> perspective, provided the considerations and recommendations presented in this report are incorporated <br /> into the project planning and design. A summary of the primary geotechnical considerations is provided <br /> below. The summary is presented for introductory purposes only and should be used in conjunction with <br /> the complete recommendations presented in this report. <br /> • Cut slopes may be supported with SE walls, gravity wall systems, or cast-in-place (CIP) concrete walls. <br /> Some short cut slopes may be faced with rockeries,with certain limitations. <br /> ■ New fill embankments may be supported with SE walls,gravity wall systems, or CIP concrete walls. <br /> • Walls 1 and 2 are planned as a CIP concrete walls at this time. <br /> ■ Most of the on-site soils observed in the explorations contain a high percentage of fines(silt and clay). <br /> Based on the results of the laboratory moisture content tests, portions of the on-site soils may be <br /> suitable for reuse as fill during dry weather only. Imported gravel borrow will be necessary during wet <br /> weather and when the existing soils are too wet to achieve compaction.We recommend the suitability <br /> of the exposed soils be evaluated during construction when they are exposed and a contingency be <br /> planned to use import soils. <br /> • New station retaining walls should be supported on structural fill or the existing subgrade soils <br /> compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density(MDD) per ASTM D-1557. <br /> ■ Light weight fill may be necessary for the new station pad to be located on north-bound Airport Road <br /> north of 100th Street SW to limit loading on the existing block wall. <br /> These and other geotechnical considerations and recommendations are discussed further in the following <br /> sections of this report. <br /> Earthquake Engineering <br /> Design Earthquake Parameters <br /> Seismic design of the walls should be completed using the design criteria presented in the WSDOT <br /> Geotechnical Design Manual (GDM) and AASHTO specifications. For this alignment, the recommended <br /> parameters for Site Class,peak ground acceleration(PGA),short period spectral response acceleration(Ss), <br /> 1-second period spectral response acceleration(Si),and Seismic Coefficients FPGA, FA and Fv are presented <br /> below in Table 2. The values presented below are based on the 2002 USGS National Seismic Hazards <br /> Mapping project for determining a peak ground (bedrock) acceleration coefficient for design for an <br /> GEOENGINEERS_ April 14,2017 , Page 10 <br /> File No.2095-032-00 <br />