Laserfiche WebLink
Other Considerations <br /> Retaining systems used to achieve grade transitions or for landscaping can be constructed using traditional <br /> structural systems such as reinforced concrete and concrete masonry unit (CMU) blocks. Alternatively, <br /> 'retaining walls can consist of reinforced soil and block facing structures, which may be an economically <br /> reasonable alternative to more traditional retaining wall systems. Non-structural systems such as rockeries <br /> may also be used to achieve grade transitions, although these systems are more suitable against dense <br /> native soils rather than fill soils. We can provide additional design recommendations and wall details for <br /> retaining structures, if requested. <br /> The proposed wall for the station at north-bound Airport Road north of 100th Street SW will be situated <br /> upslope of an existing block wall constructed by Snohomish County. The existing block wall is about 8 to <br /> 10 feet in height.At this time,we do not know if the existing block wall can support the new fill. If the County <br /> determines that the existing wall cannot support the new fill, we recommend that light weight geofoam <br /> blocks be used behind the new retaining wall to establish the design grade. <br /> Wall 1 and 2 Cast-in-Place Walls <br /> Two conventional CIP walls are being considered for the improvements, one on the south side of <br /> 128th Street SE immediately west of the south-bound 1-5 on-ramp and north of Denny's (referred to as <br /> Wall 1),and the other on the north side of 128th Street SE immediately east of the north-bound 1-5 on-ramp <br /> (referred to as Wall 2). Wall 1 will range in height from about 4 feet to a maximum of 10 feet, Wall 2, <br /> depending on the final wall alignment, could vary in height from about 3 feet to a maximum of 15 feet. <br /> These walls will retain new fill placed as part of the roadway and sidewalk widening. <br /> Shallow foundations for CIP walls may be designed using AASHTO and WSDOT methods using the allowable <br /> bearing pressures presented in Table 4. The figure and table provide allowable bearing capacity for the <br /> combination of dead and long-term live loads. Bearing pressures may be increased by one-third to account <br /> for short term live loads such as those induced by wind or seismic forces. <br /> The foundation widths referenced in Table 4 are effective widths and should be corrected for eccentric <br /> loading conditions by the following equation: <br /> B' = B - 2ey <br /> Where: <br /> B' is the effective footing width; <br /> B is the actual footing width; and <br /> eY is the eccentricity along the footing width. <br /> The eccentricity is measured from the center of the footing to the location of the resultant reaction force <br /> along the length of the footing (x-axis) and the width of the footing (y-axis). Refer to Chapter 8.11 of the <br /> WSDOT GDM for additional information regarding eccentricity. <br /> GEOENGINEERS� April 14,2017 Page 14 <br /> File No.2095-032-00 <br />