Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />3. Tne impact of trafCc generated by the proposed use on the surrounding area, <br />pedestrian circulation and public safety; and the aUility of the proponent to mitigate <br />such potential impacts. <br />Finding: The proposal may generate som� minimal [raffic associated with the initial <br />ins[allation and set-up. However, once [he facility is opernting, no on-going traffic will <br />be generated, odier than an occasiona] maintenance visit. <br />Conclusion: There will be no adverse traffic impacts generated by the proposal. <br />4. The provision of adequate off-street parking, on-site circulation, and si:.e access. <br />Tinding: No permanent on-site parhing is required for the proposal. <br />Conclusion: Not applicable. <br />5. Compatibility of proposed structures and improvements with surrounding <br />properties, including the size, height, location, setback and arrangement of all <br />proposed buildings and facilities, especially as they relate to light and shadow <br />impacts on more sensitive land uses and less intensive zones. <br />Tinding: The components associated with the proposal will be erected on the roof of an <br />existing, 2-story office building. The suirounding area is developed with mainly office <br />and commercial uses. Tne antennas would be approximately five feet liigh by six inches <br />wide. Due ro their pl�cement on the roof of the building, the antennas would be <br />somewhat visible from the syrrounding properties to the noRh and south of the .,ubject <br />properties. There are nvo existing wireless installations on the roof operated by Quest <br />and Metricom at present. The existing antennas are located near the parapet wall and, <br />consequently, are quite visible from the surrounding area. The proposed antennas would <br />be located within the interior portion of the roof and would be somewhat less visible than <br />the existing an[ennas. <br />Conclusion: In order to minimize visual impacts on surrounding properties, the antennas <br />must be painted to match the color of the building exterior. The muunting brackets <br />should be a single-mast type, as shown in the plans on file at the Planning/Community <br />Development Department. <br />G. The number, size and location of signs, especially as they relate to more sensitive <br />Iand uses. <br />Tinding: No signaee is proposed. <br />Concfusion: Not applicable. <br />�5 <br />