Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> 6 PBbkuaey 00 1878 <br /> The-regular meetingof the Everett City Council was called to order at <br /> February <br /> nHearing f <br /> Courthouse <br /> with .Gipsonpresg and all councilmen in attend- <br /> ance Councilman President .who arrived <br /> :2s. <br /> STORM EATER DRABHAOE PROPOSAL(Ce782-30 a CH782-31) <br /> Lloyd City engineer,s time t y had been in- <br /> volved innarfederally supported study referred t the city <br /> Study which <br /> Included participants from Snohomish County,Ring County and the City of <br /> The principal o investigate the <br /> problemsof caused eby urban was <br /> Puget Sou esina <br /> to proves <br /> ideconsistentsound guidance et tme goalsregarding <br /> storm management. Saidthe .elements c the <br /> study-were a policyae drainage'ordinance,community <br /> omprehensive drainage <br /> plans and a procedures manual. <br /> He said the policy items in pxdiowd resolution before the council <br /> werefollows: (1gxordinancest Tal xf, ( <br /> calla• <br /> ing for a procedure manual, (3)calling fox wnprehenaivedrainage Plan <br /> (4)madinin natural systems-minimum r off, (5)defining property <br /> owners responsibility toward <br /> aue flow, 18)Property own eseonai- <br /> - <br /> bo£itiefor prorol vidines run-off c measures, (7)Public Propery r fe and(0)new areas separate a7 -approval t0 con- <br /> neck to the combined system. <br /> e then reviewed the proposed drainage ordinance,explaining the drainage <br /> Plan,. bends a liability insurance required,city assumption of oper- <br /> atlon and maintenance and also retroactivity to city maintenance of drain- <br /> age£aCilltiesTen <br /> A summary of the drain a plan ws as follows: 1)definition of areas, <br /> FFF 2) ion ponding,3)detention pending,4)infiltration,5)piping, <br /> 6))c m <br /> he nt r p <br /> ,7)inlet capacity,8)flow control devices, )stream <br /> control,and 10)regional detention ponds. <br />!.. He said the city had been divided into four areas. A) the n end of <br /> the <br /> e1city,older R where there is a combined DO R)alongROORARteo <br /> Boulevard from Ca north tothe bay,C and DO were the seu oily <br /> endsoftown with one portionflowinginto the river and the other por- <br /> tion flowing into the county. <br /> aR ERR th t procedures ma ual to the coun- <br /> rilthexhia w a prepared underxthen2c8 3 udy also. <br /> Councilman Bandar asked he city would be 1ordinance <br /> this <br /> not adoptedweend <br /> ber <br /> ckPhomdson Admr <br /> inistrativefelt city <br /> couy Michele asked if thiss going to be more restraining o <br /> the developer and n felt this y different what <br /> was infforce <br /> now, <br /> ther butthathe <br /> hep0ordinance would wput everything on paper as a <br /> CouncilmanregAldcxoft suggested the landowners and developers be notified <br /> so that the city could get their input on the proposals. <br /> Mayor Furore said h with 25 c the various issues <br /> and them were told drainage proposal.on They mad the state- <br />, <br /> of anpolicies in the <br /> city a they anted m <br /> me things definitely in regulations such proposed ordinancebeforethe council tonight. <br />