My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4288
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 4288
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2017 11:33:12 AM
Creation date
4/4/2017 11:33:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
4288
Date
6/19/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A <br /> ‘44•14ETT <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 4288 <br /> A RESOLUTION opposing a House Appropriations Committee proposal calling for a$300 <br /> million reduction in the funding level for federal Community Development Block Grants. <br /> Whereas,the federal Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)program was established <br /> 21 years ago to assist local communities in addressing local needs,particularly those involving <br /> housing, human and social services,and other community services that provide critical <br /> assistance to low-income citizens and families; and <br /> Whereas,this program has been singled out both federally and locally as a program that works <br /> well and provides dollars directly to those who need it most; and <br /> Whereas,unlike some other federal programs,the CDBG program carries with it very low <br /> administrative and overhead costs--only 13 percent,for example, in Everett; and <br /> Whereas,the CDBG program is an excellent example of one that provides local flexibility, <br /> using federal dollars to help facilitate a solution and then allowing local communities to establish <br /> a process and decide how those funds should best be distributed to address the problems; and <br /> Whereas,this program also is an excellent example of a notion embraced by this Congress, <br /> namely that governments closest to the people are best equipped to serve those people; and <br /> Whereas,in Everett,there are a series of"success stories"which illustrate how seed funding <br /> through the CDBG program was combined with other monies to make a real difference in <br /> peoples' lives; and <br /> Whereas,cities across America,Everett in particular,understand and recognize the magnitude <br /> of the federal budget deficit and realize that cities already have sacrificed in absorbing federal <br /> cuts and will be asked to sacrifice further;and <br /> Whereas,a number of the cuts involving cities are and will be in the human and social service <br /> arena, making the CDBG program even more critically important; and <br /> Whereas,already-established cuts in the human/social service area will further burden local <br /> communities; and <br /> Whereas,this is especially true for cities such as Everett which have been impacted by sales tax <br /> exemption legislation at the local level that will result in millions of dollars in reduced revenues <br /> --at the very time that there is increased pressure upon the city to increase the amount of dollars <br /> it sets aside through its own"human needs"program; and <br /> Whereas,as Congress undergoes the very necessary process of setting budget and spending <br /> priorities, it will be important to determine how well a program has fared and whether it has <br /> served the people for whom it was designed; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.