My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3723 RUCKER AVE Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
RUCKER AVE
>
3723
>
Geotech Report
>
3723 RUCKER AVE Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 11:41:29 AM
Creation date
9/26/2019 2:38:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RUCKER AVE
Street Number
3723
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FIELA E%PIARATION AND LABORATORY TESTING <br />Our field explaration was performed on October 9, 1985. Subsurface <br />conditiona in the area of the proposed building were explored by excavating <br />four test pits xith a backhoe to a maximum depth of 14.2 feet below the <br />existing ground surface. <br />The locations of the test pits were approximately determined by measnrements <br />from knovn pointa on the property aurvey. Elevations of the test pi[s were <br />determined by interpolation from elevations shown cn the site survey. These <br />locations are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 1. <br />The field exploretion was continuously monitored by an engineer�.ng geologist <br />who clessified the soil condition:+ encountered, maintained a log oE each <br />test pit, obtained representative samples, and observed pertinent site <br />feetures. All samples were visually class:fied in accordance with the <br />Unified Soil Classificetion System, which is Fresented on Figure 2. Logs of <br />the test pits are presented with this report on Figures 3 through 4. ThesP <br />logs repreaent our interpretation of the field logs and the results of the <br />lab�:atory exemination and tests performed on field samples. <br />Several representative soil semples obtained from the tcst pits were plbced <br />in closed containers and re[urned to our laboratory for further examination <br />and testing. Moiature contents were determined for all Chese samples. The <br />resulta of these teats, es well as the soil cicisaificatione are shown �.-. the <br />loga included with this repor[. <br />SOIL CONDITIONS <br />7'he subsurface conditions beneath the proposed buildinv were explored b�r <br />excavating 4 test pits around the building area. In general, all of the <br />subsoils noted in the test pits were uniform. <br />J The 6uilding area is underlain by about 11 to 13.5 feet of loose uncontrolled <br />fill materiels. These fills consiat of generally silty sands with varying <br />gravel content along with localized debris. Some cleaner pit run sands were <br />noted as fill, in the pits excavated closer to the old restaurant and paving <br />J area. Occasional wood, bricks, roots and wire were observed in the fill in <br />each of the pits. The fill was generally in a loose candition nnd some <br />sloughing of the test pit walls was noted in all the pits. A large piece of <br />J concrete debris or a concrete slab was noted in Test Pit TP-2 at a depth of 7 <br />feet. The recently placed f:lls of up to 4 feet in depth were evidently <br />placed over much older fill materiels in a Uuried swale area. <br />J The fills overlie an organic layer of topsoil, fiils and sone debris observed <br />near the base of the test pits, overlying apparent native soils. The <br />topsoil/fill layer is about 1 to 1.5 feet thick in some areas. The <br />1 underlying firmer native soils �onsist of clean to silty sands in a medium <br />� dense condition. <br />Project No. T-233, Page 3 <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.