Laserfiche WebLink
FIELA E%PIARATION AND LABORATORY TESTING <br />Our field explaration was performed on October 9, 1985. Subsurface <br />conditiona in the area of the proposed building were explored by excavating <br />four test pits xith a backhoe to a maximum depth of 14.2 feet below the <br />existing ground surface. <br />The locations of the test pits were approximately determined by measnrements <br />from knovn pointa on the property aurvey. Elevations of the test pi[s were <br />determined by interpolation from elevations shown cn the site survey. These <br />locations are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 1. <br />The field exploretion was continuously monitored by an engineer�.ng geologist <br />who clessified the soil condition:+ encountered, maintained a log oE each <br />test pit, obtained representative samples, and observed pertinent site <br />feetures. All samples were visually class:fied in accordance with the <br />Unified Soil Classificetion System, which is Fresented on Figure 2. Logs of <br />the test pits are presented with this report on Figures 3 through 4. ThesP <br />logs repreaent our interpretation of the field logs and the results of the <br />lab�:atory exemination and tests performed on field samples. <br />Several representative soil semples obtained from the tcst pits were plbced <br />in closed containers and re[urned to our laboratory for further examination <br />and testing. Moiature contents were determined for all Chese samples. The <br />resulta of these teats, es well as the soil cicisaificatione are shown �.-. the <br />loga included with this repor[. <br />SOIL CONDITIONS <br />7'he subsurface conditions beneath the proposed buildinv were explored b�r <br />excavating 4 test pits around the building area. In general, all of the <br />subsoils noted in the test pits were uniform. <br />J The 6uilding area is underlain by about 11 to 13.5 feet of loose uncontrolled <br />fill materiels. These fills consiat of generally silty sands with varying <br />gravel content along with localized debris. Some cleaner pit run sands were <br />noted as fill, in the pits excavated closer to the old restaurant and paving <br />J area. Occasional wood, bricks, roots and wire were observed in the fill in <br />each of the pits. The fill was generally in a loose candition nnd some <br />sloughing of the test pit walls was noted in all the pits. A large piece of <br />J concrete debris or a concrete slab was noted in Test Pit TP-2 at a depth of 7 <br />feet. The recently placed f:lls of up to 4 feet in depth were evidently <br />placed over much older fill materiels in a Uuried swale area. <br />J The fills overlie an organic layer of topsoil, fiils and sone debris observed <br />near the base of the test pits, overlying apparent native soils. The <br />topsoil/fill layer is about 1 to 1.5 feet thick in some areas. The <br />1 underlying firmer native soils �onsist of clean to silty sands in a medium <br />� dense condition. <br />Project No. T-233, Page 3 <br />� <br />