4330 RUCKER AVE T MOBILE ANTENNA 2018-01-02 MF Import

2. Adequacy of streets, utilities and public services required to serve a proposed use. Findin : The use, currently and as proposed, does not cause a significant impact on traffic, utilities or pubiic services, and has used the exisling pole for a structure for especially low impact. Conclusion: Exisling streels and utilizes are adequale io serve the proposed use. 3. Impact of tra�c generated by the proposed use on the surrounding area, pedestrian circutation and public safety; the ability of tne proponent to mitigate such potentfai impacts. Findin : There will be no traffic impact generated by the proposed facility. This site is an unmanned facility. The site will require normal maintenance visits by a single employee in a light duly vehicle approximately once a month. Conclusion: The proposed use is unmanned and will not generate traffic on the surrounding area, pedeslrian circulalion and public safety. Only one maintenance visit per month is required. 4. Tlie provision for adequate off-sireet parking, on-site circulation and site access. Findinq: The site is an unmanned facility and will require only one paricina spet for a technician to park when servicing the equipment Conclusion: This proposed project will not impact off-street parking, on-site circulation or site access. 5. Compatibility of proposed structures and improvements with the surrounding properties, including the size, height, location setback and arran9ement of all proposed buildings and facilities, especialty as they relate to the light and shadow impacts on more sensitive land uses and tess intensive zones. Findinq: Existing poles or utility poles are common in most neighborl�oods, including that of the subject site. Tlierefore they are necessary and already present, making a very lo�v impact when equipment on the pole is changed, as in this project. The facilities' size, height, localion, setback will remain what they are now under the exisling use. Conclusion: This is a co-location project which is repiacing three (3) cellular transmission antennas curren:ty mounted on a utility poie. 6. The n��mber, size and lo�ation of signs, especiaily as they relate to more sensitive land uses. Finciin4: Tl�e applicant will not install any signs unless required by the FCC or tl�e 1=AA. Conclusion: All signage must be reviewed and approved by the Everett Planning Department. 7. The landscapinc�, buffering and screening of buildings, parkfng, loading and storage arcas, especially as they relate to more sensitive land uses.