Laserfiche WebLink
Findin�c �. Existing landscaping on the subject site will remain as required. With no changes in <br />struclure sizes or location, tiiere is no apparent need for additional landscaping or screening oF <br />the ground equipment. Antennas will be mounted on an existing utility pole. <br />Conclusion: 7he site presently contains plants as required by the ciiy to help screen the <br />equipment. Tlie existing landscaping and vegetation wiil provide a continuous screen of the <br />facility. <br />8. The generation of nuisance irritants such as noise, smoke, dust, odor, glare, visual <br />blight or other undesirable impacts. <br />Findin : No odors, dust, glare, smoke will be generated. Visual impact will be minimal. <br />Conclusion: The project will not generate any nuisance irritants such as noise, smoke, dust, <br />odor, glare, visual blight. <br />9. Consistency with the yoals and policies of the Everett General Plan for the area and <br />land use destgnation in which the property is located. <br />Findin : Tlie proposed construction is a modification to a co-location on an existing site. Co- <br />localions minimize tl�e need for new sites, which are much more invasive to the community than <br />a co-localion on an existing structure. The code specificaliy states that installation or co-location <br />oF antennas on existing or replacement towers or structures shall be preferred unless the <br />proponent can demonstrate that a new structure is necessary to adequately serve the needs of <br />the public. <br />Conclusion: The use is consistent with the Generai Plan and the Everett Municipal Code. <br />Within residential zones, wireless facililies are an allowed use, subject to siting guidelines found <br />under EMC 41.150.D.1.b and the granting oi a permit under Type II process (due to location in 2 <br />residential zoneJ <br />10. Compliance with the provisions of this title and other City, State and Federal <br />Regulations. <br />Findin : All necessary building and associated permils must be obtained for the proposal prior <br />to construclion. <br />Conclusion: The proposal will comply with ihe provisions of the City's Zoning Code and the <br />applicant must obtain any required State and/or Federai pennits. <br />17. Accessibility to public transit and traffic reduction measures proposed by the <br />applicant to reduce dependence of the proposed use on the automobile. <br />Findin : The facility is unmanned. <br />Conclusion: Criteria is nol applicable. <br />