Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> command post vehicle and bearcat if they are properly trained in their operation. <br /> III. PHILOSPHY <br /> By their nature,tactical operations are complex situations and inherently hazardous. The <br /> successful management and resolution of an incident often involves the need for decisions that <br /> may affect the safety of persons involved. Due to this,all operational/tactical decision making <br /> shall be made based on the priorities of life known as the Safety Priorities. <br /> A. Safety Priorities: _ <br /> 1. Hostages <br /> 2. Innocent Persons/Citizens <br /> 3. Police Officers <br /> 4. Suspects/Subjects <br /> B. The safety of suspects shall be a consideration; however,the life of a suspect shall not take <br /> precedence over the life of hostages,innocent persons/citizens, or police officers, <br /> regardless of the state of negotiations or any other activity designed to take the suspect into <br /> custody. <br /> C. Tactical Options <br /> The SWAT team shall attempt to use tactics and contingency planning to have options in <br /> place to achieve a successful tactical resolution. The following situations and options are <br /> not all inclusive and less lethal options shall always be considered. <br /> 1. Hostage Situation: In Hostage Situations,negotiations are the preferred method to <br /> achieve a resolution;however,the SWAT team should be prepared to execute an <br /> immediate tactical option if necessary to protect life. <br /> 2. Barricade Situation:Negotiations are the preferred method to achieve a <br /> resolution;however,the SWAT team may also utilize an escalation of options to <br /> include, surround and call out,breach and hold, introduction of noise flash <br /> diversionary device,introduction of chemical agents and/or less lethal options. <br /> IV. CODE OF CONDUCT <br /> A. Region 1 SWAT members shall conduct themselves in a professional manner both on and <br /> off duty. Any behavior which discredits the member or team and diminishes the <br /> effectiveness of either will be grounds for removal. Examples of such behavior include, <br /> but are not limited to: <br /> Revised 12/2013 10 <br /> 31 <br />