My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014/04/23 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
2014/04/23 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2020 11:28:14 AM
Creation date
1/28/2020 11:21:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
4/23/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> 1r /A <br /> Everett Fire Department Strategic Plan–2013 CC w+ <br /> Figure 11:Work Environment <br /> I <br /> I trust the department's senior leadership. - <br /> 1 <br /> Morale in my work group is high. 9.4 17.1 <br /> I MI <br /> Decisions at the department are made in a timely, ., <br /> impartial,and consistent manner. <br /> The work habits of officers/supervisors I work with 35.9 52 <br /> set a good example. <br /> The department provides me with the resources <br /> necessary to perform my job effectively. 22.9 42.4 22.0 <br /> I have a clear understanding of my job and <br /> 60.2 38.1 ' <br /> responsibilities. <br /> II <br /> My immediate supervisor is knowledgeable. 53.4 34.5 7.81 <br /> I <br /> 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% <br /> I •Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree L Somewhat Disagree ■Strongly Disagree ■No Opinion <br /> IThe work environment is a subjective but nonetheless important aspect of an organization's cultural <br /> climate. Given the previous responses to communication, it is perhaps not surprising that trust is low in <br /> I the management of the department. Predictably, the closer one gets to their immediate supervisor,the <br /> higher the trust level. The above figure reflects that. If communication is lacking or ineffective, trust is <br /> I eroded. If trust is eroded, morale declines. Line personnel removed from the decision-making process <br /> begin to feel disenfranchised and no longer assume positive intent by management. However, line <br /> I supervisors are separated from this downward decline in the minds of those supervised and are given <br /> the benefit of the doubt, assumed to be the same "victims" of ineffective communication as the rest of <br /> the line personnel.Thus, scores are high for immediate supervisors and low for management. <br /> I <br /> I <br /> f { Page 15 <br /> '� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.