Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Port Gardner Substation (� <br /> Project No. 1779.01 . , V 0 <br /> 15 November 2017 Geoprofessional Consultants <br /> Geologic Hazard Environmentally Critical Areas <br /> Chapter 37.080 of the Everett Municipal Code (EMC) describes geologically hazardous areas including <br /> seismic/liquefaction, landslide, and erosion hazard areas. A summary of geologic hazard critical areas is <br /> presented below. <br /> Seismic/Liquefaction Hazard: EMC 19.37.080.A.2 defines a seismic hazard area as the following: <br /> • Those areas mapped as seismic/liquefaction hazards per the Dames and Moore Methodology <br /> for the Inventory,Classification and Designation of Geologically Hazardous Areas,City of Everett, <br /> Washington:July 1, 1991. <br /> • Those areas mapped as high and moderate to high liquefaction susceptibility on the Liquefaction <br /> Susceptibility Map of Snohomish County,Washington,Washington State Department of Natural <br /> Resources, Palmer,Stephen,et al.,September 2004. <br /> The project site is included within designated seismic/liquefaction hazard areas on the two maps <br /> referenced above. This is due to the presence of relatively low-density fill material and shallow <br /> groundwater present along the Everett waterfront. <br /> The seismic performance of the site was evaluated relative to seismic hazards resulting from ground <br /> shaking associated with the Maximum Considered Earthquake Geometric Mean (MCEG) Peak Ground <br /> Acceleration and the Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER) Ground Motion Response <br /> Acceleration in accordance with the 2015 International Building Code (IBC). Conformance to the above <br /> criteria for seismic excitation does not constitute any kind of guarantee or assurance that significant <br /> structural damage or ground failure will not occur if a maximum considered earthquake occurs. The <br /> primary goal of the IBC seismic design procedure is to protect life and not to avoid all damage,since such <br /> design may be economically prohibitive. Following a major earthquake, a structure may be damaged <br /> beyond repair,yet not collapse. <br /> Ground Surface Rupture <br /> We evaluated the potential for seismic ground surface rupture at the site by reviewing the USGS <br /> Quaternary Fault Web Mapping Application.The mapping application indicates that there are no mapped <br /> Quaternary faults within 5 miles of the site. It is our opinion that the risk of ground surface rupture at <br /> the site is low. <br /> La ndsliding <br /> Based on the relatively level topography of the site and surrounding vicinity, the risk of earthquake- <br /> induced landsliding is low. <br /> PageJ4 <br />