Laserfiche WebLink
November 11, 2016 <br /> HWA Project No. 2014-117-21 <br /> 4.2 SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS <br /> 4.2.1 Seismic Design Parameters <br /> Seismic design parameters are provided based on the requirements from the 2012 International <br /> Building Code (IBC) (ICC, 2011) for design of the Transit Center. In the code, above-grade <br /> structures must be designed for the inertial forces induced by a"Maximum Considered <br /> Earthquake" (MCE), which corresponds to an earthquake with a 2%probability of exceedance <br /> (PE) in 50 years (approximately 2,475 year return period). The relevant probabilistic spectral <br /> response parameters were developed using the United States Geological Survey's website. <br /> The IBC accounts for the effects of site-specific subsurface ground conditions on the response of <br /> structures in terms of site classes. Site classes are defined by the average density and stiffness of <br /> the soil profile underlying the site. The Site Class can be correlated to the average standard <br /> penetration resistance (Nsp-r) in the upper 100 feet of the soil profile. Based on our <br /> characterization of the subsurface conditions, the subject site classifies as IBC Site Class C. <br /> Table 1 presents the design spectral seismic coefficients obtained for this site. The design peak <br /> ground acceleration was computed to be 0.385 g. <br /> Table 1. <br /> Design Seismic Coefficients for IBC 2012 Code Based Evaluation <br /> Spectral Spectral Design Spectral Design Spectral Site <br /> Site Acceleration Acceleration at Acceleration at Acceleration at Coefficients <br /> Class at 0.2 sec. 1.0 sec 0.2sec. 1.0sec. <br /> Ss,g Si,g SDs,g SD1,g <br /> Fa F,. <br /> C 1.443 0.555 0.962 0.481 1.0 1.3 <br /> 4.2.2 Ground Rupture <br /> The site is located in close proximity to the Southern Whidbey Island fault zone (SWIFZ), and is <br /> located within one to two kilometers of the northern trace of the fault(Sherrod et al., 2005). <br /> Given the location of the fault, rupture along the northern trace of the SWIFZ could propagate up <br /> through the surficial soils, resulting in potential ground rupture at the site. In our opinion, the <br /> risk of ground rupture is relatively low, but should be given consideration for essential structures. <br /> 4.2.3 Soil Liquefaction <br /> The potential for soil liquefaction must be considered during the design of any soil-supported <br /> structure. Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon where loose, saturated, granular deposits <br /> 2014-117 Final Geotechnical Report 7 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. <br />