My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/03/18 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/03/18 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:23:06 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:24:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
3/18/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Department, <br /> the Council <br /> 115 <br /> march 16,1981 <br /> • <br /> eatheeilc The Everbeing <br /> ett studied recommending the Planning Commission present and oe¢kage. Alternative are strongly <br /> the City would <br /> be <br /> be paypicking ne aeat . mately 0-158 of the coat and Associated sand would <br /> councilman Pape asked C Fullerton h many property owners would be <br /> affected by Alternative Eraw <br /> and he replied 10. <br /> horn ey representing 16 ge roper yto aown living <br /> Alternative on <br /> from a traffic,financial and environmental standpoint. He felt the <br /> engineericommittead chosen Alternative E because it w <br /> engineering technical y hadb as best as ar as n <br /> because <br /> aA1te: vam �aigh[�oE wthey apt <br /> at the Intersectirnof which would cost approximately$18,000. <br /> - wa <br /> - y acquisition under Alternative e woe.co approximately <br /> 5109,000. <br /> He commented on:the statement that E was the better alternative because <br /> wasit out e. He pointed <br /> only <br /> Engineeringap e ide,whereas Alternative B was an 86 inathe proposed <br /> new of were a Alternative E would <br /> mead neighborhood of homeownersPwhoehad lived in that area for many, <br /> manHe y years. <br /> tea a au a of[ additionaltraffic using <br /> the new road. said the <br /> ethealev the d b <br /> ttm 1 the ehou arae level <br /> roper dobe • <br /> ookithao of <br /> w n.n than the green entre , <br /> would betwere removed to make room for tthis new road.ere now. Much of the old growth • <br /> of fir andalders <br /> %:14=2:°7;,the 21tes Dada and also the removai <br /> of vegetation and many trees. She opposed E. <br /> uo cou 7.7%o e EAltetnehivele opposed Alternative E ane urged <br /> RieeWaaler,of hisne <br /> rdRoa,said this <br /> neighborhood <br /> d <br /> had abeput <br /> of in there at <br /> 1 roper on representing inhalf <br /> also caused Alternative E. This the <br /> noise onher <br /> pFtvvaluele h pr lirtyand <br /> Leis Jamison,of 6918:Lower <br /> Ridge Road,Leon Covert,of 22 W.Madison,William Forum,of 682S Lower <br /> Ridge Road,Stan mcCutcheon,of 12 W. <br /> Lower Ridge Road,Tim Williams, f 6820ac Fuller, <br /> KeOf 30 W.madison,and mary M d <br /> and Lower Ridge Road,al pokeiagainst Alternative E.s,owner of H H Grocery a .a icon <br /> crane,o oc d sa vela in answer to ti <br /> theiad iodic to C would both bacceptable <br /> r dAbeen nd <br /> the <br /> first priority by bouldenC ydhad wM1greed cost and •• <br /> felt the City <br /> make the decision as to alternative was the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.