Laserfiche WebLink
423 <br /> . October Cobs[15,1906 <br /> client had been 1n opetation for 15 years and had done nothing to <br /> I'm' s <br /> thea out of this location. The Police Department had v <br /> 1 q"11 It'",, <br /> ' little trouble with this business. said the general policy of <br /> lir <br /> the city 1s that non-conforming uses are <br /> grandfathered in and his <br /> clients business was the same as one with Live entertainment <br /> 1 "� because the problems are different. <br /> II tl <br /> I :' Ber .Sr. o£600 Rose Way,ured the adoption of the ordinance <br /> r.41' i', that through legal ways,these types of businesses can be put in <br /> certain areas. school s areas.O e <br /> Doper of 1018 Lombard, felt [hese laces should by placed <br /> j away atedobe and residence re objected to the Palomino <br /> be <br /> : lob being the <br /> between two Dol a e suggested they be <br /> :!!!!;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::':: <br /> open only during tM1elakeeveningFoursxFenthe <br /> faround. tle supported o[he ordinance beforethe6f [epresentvng Show W[ld said SF1s ordinance�' y. would force <br /> [h Ct[ee ex istin9t their <br /> businesses <br /> 1n Cha <br /> -in till, city. Be sand at 1L forcethen to terminate heir ssi neemea and <br /> move 0 said s would <br /> most [point Planning Commission nesting <br /> VLfj I concerning this issue he had pointed out that his client had <br /> 4 '1 Iii 1 Invested 300,000 to const ct hie facility,in ac<O[dan a pith ail <br /> e wool oning end licensing late. If Shie dinance Se adoptede <br /> ��d <br /> be would be forced to litigate the because <br /> is of ely <br /> 1I t' .0 ordinance and the amortizationJust <br /> compo provision because taking <br /> is s client's <br /> IY 47E o perty nt re pay Hoek compensation for the taking of iga client's <br /> t'e <br /> property should <br /> sm a said is avoid this kind of litigation, the <br /> u` council should make these buaineeeee non the Planning <br /> uses and in <br /> qd 1 '11# effect,one <br /> d s d S said et the Planning a location <br /> meeting one ember Fad said they He <br /> in business near the location <br /> of magazine store and didn't realise i h and the pollee <br /> i� i phad roblems. <br /> He that there a[ no currentj lax enforcement <br /> ly <br /> 71 dispersed Me suggested a Chats these threer businesses were widely <br /> i dispersed In the cit[end were causing <br /> n problems so the council <br /> Itt� lj, s ehFeuld adapt the ordinance before he d g dfa[her these <br /> .eiII,+1 I Councilmen Stephenson said the council had 11 these options before <br /> IpI 'II t then and he was sure they would deal with this in a fair and <br /> �f equitable manner. <br /> I Ida d Sharon Nelson of 5013 So. 310 Ave. objected to boning the 20ea <br /> adjacent is their neighbo[M1ood zoned Par th ie use. <br /> Michelle Mitchell of 1028 Wetmore spoke against this type of 1.11:011!'dil business and particularly locating any on Smith Ieland. She felt <br /> Y d they should be put some place where they wouldn't be so visible to <br /> 'LI {I 1)j1. the children and the general public. <br /> I{ II i1,I,I,; Bill o Oolyard of 1005 131st. St., 1'arysville reminded d the council <br /> r NN IY that law Fed been passed making liquor establishments responsible if <br /> g�l,,111' <br /> � IS someone they o had served had n acciden' etc. e asked if these <br /> !i!i businesses would be held responsible if a watching the show <br /> Irlypil went out and sexually assaulted ono her person. <br /> } I:t$11181,t11 <br /> 'ef11I xl Ourele[of 551 2Pilchuck0011001 Path 055 and <br /> the ordinance as written <br /> 1 p it with the two year amortisation clause and objected to g[andfatberin9 <br /> 94 the businesses v She also objected t he Palomino Club being <br /> r ill ll" ' <br /> hp t LI <br />